Realistic reporting of life insurance company policy liabilities and profits: developments in Anglo-American countries

M. Adams, C. Scott
{"title":"Realistic reporting of life insurance company policy liabilities and profits: developments in Anglo-American countries","authors":"M. Adams, C. Scott","doi":"10.1017/S0020268100020229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines international developments in life insurance generally accepted accounting practice (GAAP) for policy valuation and profit recognition in four major Anglo-American markets—the U.K., Australia, the U.S.A. and Canada. Each valuation method examined has its advantages and disadvantages with respect to the needs of preparers and users of the annual corporate reports of life insurance companies. The paper documents that the statutory basis and U.S. GAAP are considered to have substantive deficiencies. In contrast, the U.K. accruals method, the Australian margin on services method and Canadian GAAP have much to commend them, particularly with regard to their flexibility to accommodate valuation adjustments for unexpected events. Nevertheless, from the preparers' point of view, the systems which would have to be developed to facilitate the U.K. accruals and Australian margin on services methods would be difficult and costly to implement. Profit reporting under Canadian GAAP is also sensitive to changes in actuarial reserving assumptions. The authors conclude that, since national preferences in actuarial and accounting practices are inevitable and because the product-market structures of life insurance markets are so distinctive, international harmonisation of life office GAAP is unlikely to occur for a very long time.","PeriodicalId":81715,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Actuaries","volume":"121 1","pages":"441-458"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0020268100020229","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Institute of Actuaries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020268100020229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This paper examines international developments in life insurance generally accepted accounting practice (GAAP) for policy valuation and profit recognition in four major Anglo-American markets—the U.K., Australia, the U.S.A. and Canada. Each valuation method examined has its advantages and disadvantages with respect to the needs of preparers and users of the annual corporate reports of life insurance companies. The paper documents that the statutory basis and U.S. GAAP are considered to have substantive deficiencies. In contrast, the U.K. accruals method, the Australian margin on services method and Canadian GAAP have much to commend them, particularly with regard to their flexibility to accommodate valuation adjustments for unexpected events. Nevertheless, from the preparers' point of view, the systems which would have to be developed to facilitate the U.K. accruals and Australian margin on services methods would be difficult and costly to implement. Profit reporting under Canadian GAAP is also sensitive to changes in actuarial reserving assumptions. The authors conclude that, since national preferences in actuarial and accounting practices are inevitable and because the product-market structures of life insurance markets are so distinctive, international harmonisation of life office GAAP is unlikely to occur for a very long time.
寿险公司保单责任与利润的现实报告:英美国家的发展
本文考察了在英美四个主要市场——英国、澳大利亚、美国和加拿大,人寿保险保单估值和利润确认的公认会计准则(GAAP)的国际发展。就人寿保险公司年度公司报告的编制者和使用者的需要而言,每一种评估方法都有其优点和缺点。该文件表明,法定基础和美国公认会计准则被认为存在实质性缺陷。相比之下,英国的权责发生制法、澳大利亚的服务利润率法和加拿大公认会计准则有很多值得称道的地方,特别是在适应意外事件估值调整的灵活性方面。然而,从编制人的观点来看,为便利英国应计项目和澳大利亚服务利润率方法而必须制定的制度执行起来将是困难和昂贵的。加拿大公认会计准则下的利润报告对精算准备金假设的变化也很敏感。作者的结论是,由于各国在精算和会计实践方面的偏好是不可避免的,而且寿险市场的产品市场结构是如此独特,因此在很长一段时间内,寿险公司公认会计准则的国际统一不太可能发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信