Theories of culture in racist discourse☆

Kevin Durrheim , John Dixon
{"title":"Theories of culture in racist discourse☆","authors":"Kevin Durrheim ,&nbsp;John Dixon","doi":"10.1016/S1090-9524(01)00024-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article considers the ways in which White South African holidaymakers justify racial segregation and criticize social transformation by explaining segregation as the natural and hence inevitable outcome of the ‘fact’ that humans are cultural beings. By investigating the ontological features of the racial discourse, we draw attention to the way in which ordinary people use universal theories about humans – as cultural beings – to naturalize racist practices. The rhetorical force of the arguments was derived from a scientific way of thinking. They were universalising and objectifying, and were arranged to disconfirm plausible rival hypotheses. The arguments functioned ideologically to defend segregation and criticize social transformation in South Africa, which they did by placing ontological limits on ‘what is’ and ‘what is possible’ regarding cultural contact. The paper concludes by suggesting that cultural and biological discourse of ‘race’ share common rhetorical and ideological strategies and functions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88662,"journal":{"name":"Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 93-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1090-9524(01)00024-9","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090952401000249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2001/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

This article considers the ways in which White South African holidaymakers justify racial segregation and criticize social transformation by explaining segregation as the natural and hence inevitable outcome of the ‘fact’ that humans are cultural beings. By investigating the ontological features of the racial discourse, we draw attention to the way in which ordinary people use universal theories about humans – as cultural beings – to naturalize racist practices. The rhetorical force of the arguments was derived from a scientific way of thinking. They were universalising and objectifying, and were arranged to disconfirm plausible rival hypotheses. The arguments functioned ideologically to defend segregation and criticize social transformation in South Africa, which they did by placing ontological limits on ‘what is’ and ‘what is possible’ regarding cultural contact. The paper concludes by suggesting that cultural and biological discourse of ‘race’ share common rhetorical and ideological strategies and functions.

种族主义话语中的文化理论
本文考虑了南非白人度假者为种族隔离辩护的方式,并通过将种族隔离解释为人类是文化生物这一“事实”的自然和不可避免的结果来批评社会转型。通过调查种族话语的本体论特征,我们提请注意普通人如何使用关于人类的普遍理论-作为文化存在-将种族主义实践归化。辩论的修辞力量来自于一种科学的思维方式。他们将事物普遍化和客观化,并被安排去否定貌似合理的对立假设。这些论点在意识形态上为种族隔离辩护,并批评南非的社会转型,他们通过对文化接触的“是什么”和“可能是什么”施加本体论限制来做到这一点。本文最后提出,“种族”的文化和生物学话语具有共同的修辞和意识形态策略和功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书