Evaluation of Gabapentin in an Outpatient and Office-based Sample of Epilepsy Patients

Cynthia L Harden , Syed Hosain , Blagovest Nikolov , Douglas R Labar
{"title":"Evaluation of Gabapentin in an Outpatient and Office-based Sample of Epilepsy Patients","authors":"Cynthia L Harden ,&nbsp;Syed Hosain ,&nbsp;Blagovest Nikolov ,&nbsp;Douglas R Labar","doi":"10.1016/S0896-6974(97)00140-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A retrospective analysis of charts of patients who received gabapentin (GBP) as adjunctive anticonvulsant therapy in its first year of marketing, between March 1994 and April 1995 was conducted to evaluate patterns of use, side effects, and efficacy in the general epilepsy population. Ninety patients (45 men, 45 women) with an average age of 33.5 years (range: 7 months–78 years) were included. Average GBP dosage was 1700 mg/day; 46 patients took &lt;1800 mg, and 44 patients took ⩾1800 mg/day. Duration of GBP treatment ranged from 1 month–14 months. Patients took an average of 1.7 concurrent antiepileptic drugs while on GBP. A total of 13 patients were on GBP monotherapy, four at the outset joined by nine others during the study. Gabapentin was associated with improvement as assessed by reduction of seizure frequency in 69 patients (77%). Sixty patients (67%) who reported no side effects had a mean GBP dosage of 1900 mg/day (median: 2000 mg/day). The 30 patients who experienced side effects had a mean GBP dosage of 1600 mg/day (median: 1500 mg/day). Gabapentin was discontinued in 21 patients, six because of side effects, nine because of lack of efficacy, and six because of a combination of both. Gabapentin was used in more difficult patients with intractable epilepsy and was generally well tolerated. Higher doses were not associated with more side effects, suggesting that GBP-related side effects may not be dose-related.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epilepsy","volume":"11 3","pages":"Pages 130-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0896-6974(97)00140-0","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epilepsy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896697497001400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of charts of patients who received gabapentin (GBP) as adjunctive anticonvulsant therapy in its first year of marketing, between March 1994 and April 1995 was conducted to evaluate patterns of use, side effects, and efficacy in the general epilepsy population. Ninety patients (45 men, 45 women) with an average age of 33.5 years (range: 7 months–78 years) were included. Average GBP dosage was 1700 mg/day; 46 patients took <1800 mg, and 44 patients took ⩾1800 mg/day. Duration of GBP treatment ranged from 1 month–14 months. Patients took an average of 1.7 concurrent antiepileptic drugs while on GBP. A total of 13 patients were on GBP monotherapy, four at the outset joined by nine others during the study. Gabapentin was associated with improvement as assessed by reduction of seizure frequency in 69 patients (77%). Sixty patients (67%) who reported no side effects had a mean GBP dosage of 1900 mg/day (median: 2000 mg/day). The 30 patients who experienced side effects had a mean GBP dosage of 1600 mg/day (median: 1500 mg/day). Gabapentin was discontinued in 21 patients, six because of side effects, nine because of lack of efficacy, and six because of a combination of both. Gabapentin was used in more difficult patients with intractable epilepsy and was generally well tolerated. Higher doses were not associated with more side effects, suggesting that GBP-related side effects may not be dose-related.

加巴喷丁在门诊和门诊癫痫患者中的应用评价
回顾性分析了1994年3月至1995年4月在加巴喷丁(GBP)上市第一年接受加巴喷丁辅助抗惊厥治疗的患者图表,以评估其在普通癫痫人群中的使用模式、副作用和疗效。纳入90例患者(男45例,女45例),平均年龄33.5岁(范围:7个月- 78岁)。GBP平均剂量为1700 mg/d;46名患者服用1800毫克,44名患者服用大于或等于1800毫克/天。GBP治疗持续时间从1个月到14个月不等。患者在服用GBP时平均同时服用1.7种抗癫痫药物。共有13名患者接受GBP单药治疗,其中4名在研究开始时加入,另外9名在研究期间加入。加巴喷丁与69例患者(77%)癫痫发作频率的降低有关。报告无副作用的60例患者(67%)的平均GBP剂量为1900 mg/天(中位数:2000 mg/天)。出现副作用的30例患者的平均GBP剂量为1600 mg/天(中位数:1500 mg/天)。21名患者停用加巴喷丁,6名是因为副作用,9名是因为缺乏疗效,6名是因为两者兼有。加巴喷丁用于难治性癫痫患者,通常耐受性良好。较高的剂量与更多的副作用无关,这表明与gbp相关的副作用可能与剂量无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信