Memory strategy monitoring in adults and children

Michael Pressley, Joel R. Levin, Elizabeth S. Ghatala
{"title":"Memory strategy monitoring in adults and children","authors":"Michael Pressley,&nbsp;Joel R. Levin,&nbsp;Elizabeth S. Ghatala","doi":"10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90181-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In five experiments, adults and 11- to 13-year-old children were exposed to two study strategies for vocabulary learning: repetition of words with meanings and associative elaboration (the keyword method). Subjects were asked to choose one of the two study methods for learning a 24-item list of new vocabulary words. Adults demonstrated awareness of the relative efficacy of the two study strategies only following practice with the two methods accompanied by a test on the practice list. They did not exhibit an awareness of the relative utility of the two methods when the practice test was omitted. Children, in addition to having to experience the practice list and test, required explicit feedback about their performance with the two strategies before they demonstrated clear awareness that the elaboration method was superior. The data are relevant to recent positions on the role of metacognitive experiences for metacognitive knowledge and cognitive actions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":89821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior","volume":"23 2","pages":"Pages 270-288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90181-6","citationCount":"180","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022537184901816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2004/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 180

Abstract

In five experiments, adults and 11- to 13-year-old children were exposed to two study strategies for vocabulary learning: repetition of words with meanings and associative elaboration (the keyword method). Subjects were asked to choose one of the two study methods for learning a 24-item list of new vocabulary words. Adults demonstrated awareness of the relative efficacy of the two study strategies only following practice with the two methods accompanied by a test on the practice list. They did not exhibit an awareness of the relative utility of the two methods when the practice test was omitted. Children, in addition to having to experience the practice list and test, required explicit feedback about their performance with the two strategies before they demonstrated clear awareness that the elaboration method was superior. The data are relevant to recent positions on the role of metacognitive experiences for metacognitive knowledge and cognitive actions.

成人和儿童的记忆策略监测
在五个实验中,对成人和11 ~ 13岁儿童进行了两种词汇学习策略:有意义的单词重复和联想阐述(关键词法)。受试者被要求从两种学习方法中选择一种来学习24项新词汇表。成年人表现出两种研究策略的相对有效性的意识,只有在实践中使用两种方法并在实践清单上进行测试。当练习测试被省略时,他们没有表现出对两种方法的相对效用的意识。孩子们除了必须经历练习列表和测试之外,还需要对他们使用这两种策略的表现进行明确的反馈,然后才能清楚地意识到阐述法的优越性。这些数据与最近关于元认知经验在元认知知识和认知行为中的作用的研究有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书