Environmental assessment tools for the evaluation and improvement of European livestock production systems

Niels Halberg , Hayo M.G. van der Werf , Claudine Basset-Mens , Randi Dalgaard , Imke J.M. de Boer
{"title":"Environmental assessment tools for the evaluation and improvement of European livestock production systems","authors":"Niels Halberg ,&nbsp;Hayo M.G. van der Werf ,&nbsp;Claudine Basset-Mens ,&nbsp;Randi Dalgaard ,&nbsp;Imke J.M. de Boer","doi":"10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Different types of assessment tools have been developed in Europe with the purpose of determining the environmental impact of various livestock production systems at farm level. The assessment tools differ in terms of which environmental objectives are included and how indicators are constructed and interpreted. The paper compares typical tools for environmental assessment of livestock production systems, and recommends selected indicators suitable for benchmarking. The assessment tools used very different types of indicators ranging from descriptions of farm management and quantification of input to estimates of emissions of, e.g., nitrate and ammonia. The indicators should be useful in a benchmarking process where farmers may improve their practices through learning from farms with better agri-environmental performance. An example of this is given using data on P-surplus on pig farms. Some indicators used the area of the farm as the basis of the indicator—e.g. nitrogen surplus per hectare—while others were expressed per unit produced, e.g. emission of greenhouse gasses per kilogram milk. The paper demonstrates that a comparison of organic vs. conventional milk production and comparison of three pig production systems give different results, depending on the basis of the indicators (i.e. per hectare or per kilogram product). Indicators linked to environmental objectives with a local or regional geographical target should be area-based—while indicators with a global focus should be product-based. It is argued that the choice of indicators should be linked with the definition of the system boundaries, in the sense that area-based indicators should include emissions on the farm only, whereas product-based indicators should preferably include emissions from production of farm inputs, as well as the inputs on the actual farm. The paper ends with recommendations for choice of agri-environmental indicators taking into account the geographical scale, system boundary and method of interpretation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":92934,"journal":{"name":"Livestock production science","volume":"96 1","pages":"Pages 33-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.05.013","citationCount":"181","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Livestock production science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301622605001612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 181

Abstract

Different types of assessment tools have been developed in Europe with the purpose of determining the environmental impact of various livestock production systems at farm level. The assessment tools differ in terms of which environmental objectives are included and how indicators are constructed and interpreted. The paper compares typical tools for environmental assessment of livestock production systems, and recommends selected indicators suitable for benchmarking. The assessment tools used very different types of indicators ranging from descriptions of farm management and quantification of input to estimates of emissions of, e.g., nitrate and ammonia. The indicators should be useful in a benchmarking process where farmers may improve their practices through learning from farms with better agri-environmental performance. An example of this is given using data on P-surplus on pig farms. Some indicators used the area of the farm as the basis of the indicator—e.g. nitrogen surplus per hectare—while others were expressed per unit produced, e.g. emission of greenhouse gasses per kilogram milk. The paper demonstrates that a comparison of organic vs. conventional milk production and comparison of three pig production systems give different results, depending on the basis of the indicators (i.e. per hectare or per kilogram product). Indicators linked to environmental objectives with a local or regional geographical target should be area-based—while indicators with a global focus should be product-based. It is argued that the choice of indicators should be linked with the definition of the system boundaries, in the sense that area-based indicators should include emissions on the farm only, whereas product-based indicators should preferably include emissions from production of farm inputs, as well as the inputs on the actual farm. The paper ends with recommendations for choice of agri-environmental indicators taking into account the geographical scale, system boundary and method of interpretation.

用于评价和改进欧洲畜牧生产系统的环境评估工具
欧洲开发了不同类型的评估工具,目的是确定农场一级各种牲畜生产系统对环境的影响。评估工具在包括哪些环境目标以及如何构建和解释指标方面有所不同。本文比较了家畜生产系统环境评价的典型工具,并推荐了适合于基准评价的选定指标。评估工具使用了非常不同类型的指标,从对农场管理的描述和投入的量化到对硝酸盐和氨等排放物的估计。这些指标在制定基准过程中应该是有用的,农民可以通过向农业环境表现较好的农场学习来改进他们的做法。用养猪场磷盈余数据给出了一个例子。有些指标使用农场面积作为指标的基础。每公顷氮盈余-而其他则以单位产量表示,例如每公斤牛奶的温室气体排放量。本文表明,根据指标(即每公顷或每公斤产品)的不同,有机牛奶生产与传统牛奶生产的比较以及三种养猪生产系统的比较得出了不同的结果。与具有当地或区域地理目标的环境目标有关的指标应以地区为基础,而具有全球重点的指标应以产品为基础。有人认为,指标的选择应与系统边界的定义联系起来,即以地区为基础的指标应只包括农场的排放,而以产品为基础的指标最好包括农场投入生产的排放,以及实际农场的投入。最后提出了考虑地理尺度、系统边界和解释方法的农业环境指标选择建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信