Comparing risk perceptions and risk management in organic and conventional dairy farming: empirical results from Norway

O. Flaten , G. Lien , M. Koesling , P.S. Valle , M. Ebbesvik
{"title":"Comparing risk perceptions and risk management in organic and conventional dairy farming: empirical results from Norway","authors":"O. Flaten ,&nbsp;G. Lien ,&nbsp;M. Koesling ,&nbsp;P.S. Valle ,&nbsp;M. Ebbesvik","doi":"10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.10.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study was conducted to explore organic and conventional dairy farmers' perceptions of risk and risk management, and to examine relationships between farm and farmer characteristics, risk perceptions, and strategies. The data originate from a survey of conventional (<em>n</em>=363) and organic (<em>n</em>=162) dairy farmers in Norway. Organic farmers had the least risk averse perceptions. Institutional and production risks were perceived as primary sources of risk, with farm support payments at the top. Compared to their conventional colleagues, organic farmers gave more weight to institutional factors related to their production systems. Conventional farmers were more concerned about costs of purchased inputs and animal welfare policy. Organic and conventional farmers' management responses were more similar than their risk perceptions. Financial measures such as liquidity and costs of production, disease prevention, and insurance were perceived as important ways to handle risk. Even though perceptions were highly farmer-specific, a number of socio-economic variables were found to be related to risk and risk management. The primary role of institutional risks implies that policy makers should be cautious about changing policy capriciously and they should consider the scope for strategic policy initiatives that give farmers some greater confidence about the longer term. Further, researchers should pay more attention to institutional risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":92934,"journal":{"name":"Livestock production science","volume":"95 1","pages":"Pages 11-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.10.014","citationCount":"137","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Livestock production science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030162260400288X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 137

Abstract

This study was conducted to explore organic and conventional dairy farmers' perceptions of risk and risk management, and to examine relationships between farm and farmer characteristics, risk perceptions, and strategies. The data originate from a survey of conventional (n=363) and organic (n=162) dairy farmers in Norway. Organic farmers had the least risk averse perceptions. Institutional and production risks were perceived as primary sources of risk, with farm support payments at the top. Compared to their conventional colleagues, organic farmers gave more weight to institutional factors related to their production systems. Conventional farmers were more concerned about costs of purchased inputs and animal welfare policy. Organic and conventional farmers' management responses were more similar than their risk perceptions. Financial measures such as liquidity and costs of production, disease prevention, and insurance were perceived as important ways to handle risk. Even though perceptions were highly farmer-specific, a number of socio-economic variables were found to be related to risk and risk management. The primary role of institutional risks implies that policy makers should be cautious about changing policy capriciously and they should consider the scope for strategic policy initiatives that give farmers some greater confidence about the longer term. Further, researchers should pay more attention to institutional risks.

比较有机和传统奶牛养殖的风险认知和风险管理:来自挪威的实证结果
本研究旨在探讨有机奶农和传统奶农对风险和风险管理的认知,并研究农场和奶农特征、风险认知和策略之间的关系。数据来源于对挪威传统(n=363)和有机(n=162)奶农的调查。有机农民对风险的厌恶程度最低。制度风险和生产风险被认为是主要的风险来源,其中农业补贴高居榜首。与传统农民相比,有机农民更重视与其生产系统相关的制度因素。传统农民更关心购买投入物的成本和动物福利政策。有机农民和传统农民的管理反应比他们的风险认知更相似。流动性和生产成本、疾病预防和保险等财务措施被认为是处理风险的重要方式。尽管看法是高度针对农民的,但发现一些社会经济变量与风险和风险管理有关。制度风险的主要作用意味着政策制定者应该对反复无常地改变政策保持谨慎,他们应该考虑战略政策举措的范围,这些政策举措可以让农民对长期发展有更大的信心。此外,研究人员应更多地关注制度风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信