Psychopathological profile of sexting coercion perpetrators

Q3 Medicine
Aina M. Gassó , Esperanza Gómez-Durán
{"title":"Psychopathological profile of sexting coercion perpetrators","authors":"Aina M. Gassó ,&nbsp;Esperanza Gómez-Durán","doi":"10.1016/j.reml.2021.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In the past years, research regarding sexting behaviours and online sexual victimization has been rapidly growing, with literature examining the social, legal, psychological and psychopathological consequences of being coerced into sexting. However, up to date, there is little evidence exploring the psychopathological profile of sexting coercion perpetrators. The aim of this study was to examine differences in the psychopathological profile of sexting coercion perpetrators vs non-perpetrators, and, additionally, examining sex differences.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The original sample comprised 1370 college students (including 74% females, mean age<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->21.40). The non-perpetrator subsample comprised 1247 participants (76% females, mean age 21.39) and the sexting coercion perpetration subsample comprised 75 participants (30% females, mean age<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->21.38).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data indicated significant differences in the psychopathological profile between perpetrators and non-perpetrators, with the first group showing higher scores for different psychopathology scales. When examining sex differences intragroup, results showed significant differences between perpetrator males and non-perpetrator males for scales related with dysfunctional attachment, anger, frustration and social skills. Significant differences between female samples were only found for hostility. Finally, no differences were found between sexting coercion perpetrator males and females, with both groups showing similar psychopathological profiles.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>People who engaged in sexting coercion perpetration show a different psychopathological profile than those who did not report coercing someone into sexting, however, males and females coercers show similar psychopathological profiles. Further results and implications regarding psychopathological differences between examined groups are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35705,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal","volume":"47 4","pages":"Pages 157-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377473221000225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction

In the past years, research regarding sexting behaviours and online sexual victimization has been rapidly growing, with literature examining the social, legal, psychological and psychopathological consequences of being coerced into sexting. However, up to date, there is little evidence exploring the psychopathological profile of sexting coercion perpetrators. The aim of this study was to examine differences in the psychopathological profile of sexting coercion perpetrators vs non-perpetrators, and, additionally, examining sex differences.

Methods

The original sample comprised 1370 college students (including 74% females, mean age = 21.40). The non-perpetrator subsample comprised 1247 participants (76% females, mean age 21.39) and the sexting coercion perpetration subsample comprised 75 participants (30% females, mean age = 21.38).

Results

Data indicated significant differences in the psychopathological profile between perpetrators and non-perpetrators, with the first group showing higher scores for different psychopathology scales. When examining sex differences intragroup, results showed significant differences between perpetrator males and non-perpetrator males for scales related with dysfunctional attachment, anger, frustration and social skills. Significant differences between female samples were only found for hostility. Finally, no differences were found between sexting coercion perpetrator males and females, with both groups showing similar psychopathological profiles.

Conclusions

People who engaged in sexting coercion perpetration show a different psychopathological profile than those who did not report coercing someone into sexting, however, males and females coercers show similar psychopathological profiles. Further results and implications regarding psychopathological differences between examined groups are discussed.

性短信胁迫犯罪者的精神病理特征
在过去的几年里,关于性短信行为和网络性受害者的研究迅速增长,文献研究了被迫发送性短信的社会、法律、心理和精神病理后果。然而,到目前为止,很少有证据探索性短信胁迫肇事者的精神病理特征。本研究的目的是研究性短信胁迫施暴者与非施暴者在精神病理特征上的差异,此外,还研究了性别差异。方法原样本为1370名大学生,其中女性占74%,平均年龄21.40岁。非加害者子样本包括1247名参与者(76%为女性,平均年龄21.39岁),性强迫加害者子样本包括75名参与者(30%为女性,平均年龄21.38岁)。结果数据显示,施暴者和非施暴者在精神病理特征上存在显著差异,第一组在不同的精神病理量表上得分更高。当研究群体内的性别差异时,结果显示,在与功能失调依恋、愤怒、沮丧和社交技能相关的量表上,施暴者男性和非施暴者男性之间存在显著差异。女性样本之间的显著差异只存在于敌意上。最后,男性和女性在性短信胁迫犯罪者之间没有发现差异,两组人都表现出相似的精神病理特征。结论从事性短信胁迫行为的人与未报告性短信胁迫行为的人表现出不同的精神病理特征,但男性和女性胁迫者表现出相似的精神病理特征。进一步的结果和影响有关精神病理差异的研究小组进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal
Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
41 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信