Extending the two-component model of delusion to substance use disorder etiology and recovery

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
George B. Richardson , Nathan McGee
{"title":"Extending the two-component model of delusion to substance use disorder etiology and recovery","authors":"George B. Richardson ,&nbsp;Nathan McGee","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The brain disease model (BMDA) and psychosocial models of addiction attend to phenomena at different levels of biological organization, and evidence suggests neither is sufficient to explain substance use disorder (SUD). Here, we extend a Bayesian model of the emergence and persistence of delusions to SUD etiology and recovery, building upon efforts to link lower-level impacts of psychoactive compounds to higher-level phenomena such as attitudes, beliefs, and self-control. According to the resulting two-component model of SUD, psychoactive substances interact with genetic and environmental factors to produce delusions about the biological importance of substance use and its contexts by perturbating basic human affective systems. These delusions are most often revised or rejected based on individuals’ existing belief systems. But in some individuals, factors explaining the persistence of an array of delusions (e.g., lower levels of executive functioning) prevent the evaluation and revision system from rejecting or revising beliefs that attribute high salience to substance-related stimuli. This theory provides novel hypotheses regarding the potential roles of factors such as dichotomous thinking, positive illusions and self-deception, and denial or lack of awareness in SUD etiology and recovery. Furthermore, it provides an account of SUD that may result in less stigma than the BDMA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X22000058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The brain disease model (BMDA) and psychosocial models of addiction attend to phenomena at different levels of biological organization, and evidence suggests neither is sufficient to explain substance use disorder (SUD). Here, we extend a Bayesian model of the emergence and persistence of delusions to SUD etiology and recovery, building upon efforts to link lower-level impacts of psychoactive compounds to higher-level phenomena such as attitudes, beliefs, and self-control. According to the resulting two-component model of SUD, psychoactive substances interact with genetic and environmental factors to produce delusions about the biological importance of substance use and its contexts by perturbating basic human affective systems. These delusions are most often revised or rejected based on individuals’ existing belief systems. But in some individuals, factors explaining the persistence of an array of delusions (e.g., lower levels of executive functioning) prevent the evaluation and revision system from rejecting or revising beliefs that attribute high salience to substance-related stimuli. This theory provides novel hypotheses regarding the potential roles of factors such as dichotomous thinking, positive illusions and self-deception, and denial or lack of awareness in SUD etiology and recovery. Furthermore, it provides an account of SUD that may result in less stigma than the BDMA.

将妄想的双成分模型扩展到物质使用障碍的病因和恢复
脑疾病模型(BMDA)和成瘾的社会心理模型涉及不同生物组织水平的现象,证据表明两者都不足以解释物质使用障碍(SUD)。在这里,我们将妄想的出现和持续的贝叶斯模型扩展到SUD的病因和恢复,建立在将精神活性化合物的较低水平影响与较高水平现象(如态度,信念和自我控制)联系起来的基础上。根据由此产生的SUD双组分模型,精神活性物质与遗传和环境因素相互作用,通过扰乱基本的人类情感系统,产生关于物质使用及其背景的生物学重要性的错觉。根据个人现有的信仰体系,这些错觉通常会被修改或拒绝。但在某些个体中,解释一系列妄想持续存在的因素(例如,执行功能水平较低)阻止了评估和修正系统拒绝或修正将高度显著性归因于物质相关刺激的信念。这一理论为二元思维、积极幻觉和自我欺骗、否认或缺乏意识等因素在SUD病因和康复中的潜在作用提供了新的假设。此外,它提供了一个SUD的帐户,可能导致比BDMA更少的耻辱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信