Comparison of nominal and real 2D contours of manufactured products using Ant Colony Optimisation of shape landmarks

Emmanuel Stathatos, George-Christopher Vosniakos
{"title":"Comparison of nominal and real 2D contours of manufactured products using Ant Colony Optimisation of shape landmarks","authors":"Emmanuel Stathatos,&nbsp;George-Christopher Vosniakos","doi":"10.1016/j.promfg.2021.10.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In studying manufacturing processes it is often necessary to compare nominal or reference product shapes that are expected to be ideally achieved after applying a nominal set of process parameters and the actual product shape achieved. The latter is usually obtained by metrological equipment such as profilometers, tomographs and 3D scanners, whilst the former may also result from manufacturing process numerical simulation software. In this work, comparison of 2D contours is studied by adopting the well-established Procrustes method. The method relies on minimizing deviation of landmark points belonging to the shapes under scrutiny. Landmarks that need to be compared pairwise should be chosen in an optimal way, especially when the contours contain different numbers of points, when they differ locally etc. Optimal determination of landmarks and as a result implementation of contour comparison is performed through ant colony optimization implemented on Matlab<sup>TM</sup> platform. Indicative results are shown where deviations discovered signify shrinkage of a die-cast clay part.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":91947,"journal":{"name":"Procedia manufacturing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978921002195/pdf?md5=cb3bed8237883d701be9514c17a00b87&pid=1-s2.0-S2351978921002195-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978921002195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In studying manufacturing processes it is often necessary to compare nominal or reference product shapes that are expected to be ideally achieved after applying a nominal set of process parameters and the actual product shape achieved. The latter is usually obtained by metrological equipment such as profilometers, tomographs and 3D scanners, whilst the former may also result from manufacturing process numerical simulation software. In this work, comparison of 2D contours is studied by adopting the well-established Procrustes method. The method relies on minimizing deviation of landmark points belonging to the shapes under scrutiny. Landmarks that need to be compared pairwise should be chosen in an optimal way, especially when the contours contain different numbers of points, when they differ locally etc. Optimal determination of landmarks and as a result implementation of contour comparison is performed through ant colony optimization implemented on MatlabTM platform. Indicative results are shown where deviations discovered signify shrinkage of a die-cast clay part.

使用形状地标的蚁群优化对制成品的标称和实际二维轮廓进行比较
在研究制造工艺时,通常需要将应用一组标称工艺参数后期望理想实现的标称或参考产品形状与实际实现的产品形状进行比较。后者通常由测量设备获得,如轮廓仪、层析成像和3D扫描仪,而前者也可能来自制造过程数值模拟软件。在这项工作中,采用成熟的Procrustes方法研究了二维轮廓的比较。该方法依赖于最小化属于被检查形状的地标点的偏差。需要两两比较的地标应该以最优的方式选择,特别是当轮廓包含不同数量的点时,当它们局部不同时等。通过在MatlabTM平台上实现蚁群优化,实现地标的最优确定和轮廓比较。指示性结果显示,偏差发现表明收缩的压铸粘土部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信