Balancing trade-offs in one-stage production with processing time uncertainty

Wei Li , Barrie R. Nault , Jingjing You , Briscoe Bilderback
{"title":"Balancing trade-offs in one-stage production with processing time uncertainty","authors":"Wei Li ,&nbsp;Barrie R. Nault ,&nbsp;Jingjing You ,&nbsp;Briscoe Bilderback","doi":"10.1016/j.promfg.2021.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Production scheduling faces three challenges, two of which are trade-offs and the third is processing time uncertainty. The two sources of trade-offs are between inconsistent key performance indicators (KPIs), and between the expected return and the risk of KPI portfolios. Given the KPIs of total completion time (<em>TCT</em>) and variance of completion times (<em>VCT</em>) are inconsistent for one-stage production, we propose our trade-off balancing (ToB) heuristics. Based on comprehensive case studies, we show that our ToB heuristics efficiently and effectively balance the trade-offs from these two sources. Daniels and Kouvelis (DK) proposed a scheduling scheme to optimize the worst-case scenarios against processing time uncertainty, and they designed the endpoint product (EP) and endpoint sum (ES) heuristics for robust scheduling accordingly. Using 5 levels of coefficients of variation (<em>CV</em>s) to represent processing time uncertainty, we show that our ToB heuristics are robust as well, and even better than the EP and ES heuristics at high levels of processing time uncertainty. In addition, our ToB heuristics generate undominated solution spaces of KPIs, which provides a solid base in deciding control and specification limits for stochastic process control (SPC). Moreover, based on the normalized deviations from optima, our trade-off balancing scheme can be generalized to balance any inconsistent KPIs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":91947,"journal":{"name":"Procedia manufacturing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.promfg.2021.06.004","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978921000044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Production scheduling faces three challenges, two of which are trade-offs and the third is processing time uncertainty. The two sources of trade-offs are between inconsistent key performance indicators (KPIs), and between the expected return and the risk of KPI portfolios. Given the KPIs of total completion time (TCT) and variance of completion times (VCT) are inconsistent for one-stage production, we propose our trade-off balancing (ToB) heuristics. Based on comprehensive case studies, we show that our ToB heuristics efficiently and effectively balance the trade-offs from these two sources. Daniels and Kouvelis (DK) proposed a scheduling scheme to optimize the worst-case scenarios against processing time uncertainty, and they designed the endpoint product (EP) and endpoint sum (ES) heuristics for robust scheduling accordingly. Using 5 levels of coefficients of variation (CVs) to represent processing time uncertainty, we show that our ToB heuristics are robust as well, and even better than the EP and ES heuristics at high levels of processing time uncertainty. In addition, our ToB heuristics generate undominated solution spaces of KPIs, which provides a solid base in deciding control and specification limits for stochastic process control (SPC). Moreover, based on the normalized deviations from optima, our trade-off balancing scheme can be generalized to balance any inconsistent KPIs.

平衡单阶段生产与加工时间不确定性之间的权衡
生产调度面临三个挑战,其中两个是权衡,第三个是加工时间的不确定性。权衡的两个来源是在不一致的关键绩效指标(KPI)之间,以及在KPI组合的预期回报和风险之间。考虑到单阶段生产中总完工时间(TCT)和完工时间方差(VCT)的kpi不一致,我们提出了权衡平衡(ToB)启发式方法。基于全面的案例研究,我们表明我们的ToB启发式方法有效地平衡了这两个来源的权衡。daniel和Kouvelis (DK)提出了一种针对加工时间不确定性优化最坏情况的调度方案,并相应地设计了端点积(EP)和端点和(ES)启发式鲁棒调度方法。使用5个水平的变异系数(cv)来表示加工时间的不确定性,我们表明我们的ToB启发式方法也是鲁棒的,甚至在高水平的加工时间不确定性下优于EP和ES启发式方法。此外,我们的ToB启发式生成kpi的无支配解空间,这为决定随机过程控制(SPC)的控制和规格限制提供了坚实的基础。此外,基于与最优值的归一化偏差,我们的权衡平衡方案可以推广到平衡任何不一致的kpi。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信