Exploring satisfaction for transfers at intermodal interchanges: A comparison of Germany and India

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Ankita Sil , Emmanouil Chaniotakis , Uttam Kumar Roy , Constantinos Antoniou
{"title":"Exploring satisfaction for transfers at intermodal interchanges: A comparison of Germany and India","authors":"Ankita Sil ,&nbsp;Emmanouil Chaniotakis ,&nbsp;Uttam Kumar Roy ,&nbsp;Constantinos Antoniou","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubtr.2022.100005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Multimodality in Public Transport has been proven to be one of the main drivers of sustainability and economic feasibility for the last few decades. Consequently, user satisfaction for transfers is the key to adequately serving demand. This research studies on commuters’ perception of comfort at interchanges, focusing on the connection between metro systems and other modes. Satisfaction analysis and modelling is conducted using weighted regression, factor analysis and ordered logit models for nine transfers at major interchanges in two Indian cities (New Delhi and Kolkata) and one German city (Munich); aiming at revealing the differences in user satisfaction in developing and developed economy, and for different Public Transport quality and interchanges. The results indicate that factors of transfer quality, accessibility and physical hindrances are significant in Indian case and the human factor, and transfer quality are significant in the case of Munich, Germany. Additionally, it is found that perceived comfort differs on commuters’ experiences with transfer distance and time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X22000054/pdfft?md5=2f57ca7776cb24a3ded329d7fbbe600f&pid=1-s2.0-S1077291X22000054-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X22000054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Multimodality in Public Transport has been proven to be one of the main drivers of sustainability and economic feasibility for the last few decades. Consequently, user satisfaction for transfers is the key to adequately serving demand. This research studies on commuters’ perception of comfort at interchanges, focusing on the connection between metro systems and other modes. Satisfaction analysis and modelling is conducted using weighted regression, factor analysis and ordered logit models for nine transfers at major interchanges in two Indian cities (New Delhi and Kolkata) and one German city (Munich); aiming at revealing the differences in user satisfaction in developing and developed economy, and for different Public Transport quality and interchanges. The results indicate that factors of transfer quality, accessibility and physical hindrances are significant in Indian case and the human factor, and transfer quality are significant in the case of Munich, Germany. Additionally, it is found that perceived comfort differs on commuters’ experiences with transfer distance and time.

探讨多式联运交汇处的换乘满意度:德国和印度的比较
在过去的几十年里,公共交通的多式联运已被证明是可持续性和经济可行性的主要驱动力之一。因此,用户对转移的满意度是充分满足需求的关键。本研究主要研究通勤者在交通交汇处的舒适度感知,重点研究地铁系统与其他交通方式之间的连接。使用加权回归、因子分析和有序logit模型对两个印度城市(新德里和加尔各答)和一个德国城市(慕尼黑)的主要交汇处的9次换乘进行满意度分析和建模;旨在揭示经济发展中国家和发达国家用户满意度的差异,以及不同的公共交通质量和换乘方式。结果表明:印度的迁移质量、可达性和物理障碍因素显著,人为因素显著,德国慕尼黑的迁移质量显著。此外,我们还发现通勤者的感知舒适度随通勤距离和时间的不同而不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信