Retrospective study of two fixation methods for 4-corner fusion: Shape-memory staple vs. dorsal circular plate

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the results of two groups of patients with four-corner fusion, one group fixed with shape-memory staples and the other with locked circular plates. This retrospective study compared 52 wrists operated for scaphoid excision and four-corner fusion between 2005 and 2011. The arthrodesis was ensured by a shape-memory quadripodal staple (4Fusion^®, Memometal™) in 37 cases and a locking dorsal circular plate (Xpode^®, Biotech Ortho™) in 15 cases. In the staple group, the mean age was 58.5 years and the average follow-up was 4.3 years. In the circular plate group, the mean age was 58.6 years and the average follow-up was 3.1 years. Pain, range of motion, grip strength, functional scores (QuickDASH and PWRE), fusion of the midcarpal joint, complications (implant fracture and reoperation) and patients’ satisfaction were used as outcome measures. There was no pain in 43% of patients in the staple group and 40% of patients in the circular plate group at the follow-up; range of motion and functional scores were similar in both groups. Seventy-five percent of patients in the staple group were satisfied or very satisfied versus 60% in the circular plate group. The implant broke in 24.3% of cases in the staple group and 60% in the circular plate group. Reoperation was needed in 18% of the staple cases and 14% of the plate cases. There was no difference between the implants in terms of pain, range of motion, functional scores and patient satisfactory. The implant fracture rate in the plate group was high. This study brings into question implant reliability for the four-corner fusion procedure.