Federal Indian law Internet tools: Indian Territory Cases at the Oklahoma State Courts Network and Kappler's Indian Affairs: Laws and Treaties at the Oklahoma State University
{"title":"Federal Indian law Internet tools: Indian Territory Cases at the Oklahoma State Courts Network and Kappler's Indian Affairs: Laws and Treaties at the Oklahoma State University","authors":"Charles D. Bernholz","doi":"10.1016/j.jgi.2004.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In a thorough analysis of researching the regulation of the banking industry in the United States, <span>Zoller (2000)</span>. Demonstrated a number of paths among federal documents of various agencies within the Department of the Treasury, including the legislation that created these entities, and to relevant online resources. This latter opportunity included electronic access to several traditional reporting vehicles: for example, the <em>Congressional Record</em>, <em>Federal Register</em>, <em>Code of Federal Regulations</em>, <em>United States Code</em>, <em>Statutes at Large</em>, and decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court. This leveraged ability to search among digitized versions of these materials has expedited research in the banking industry and has enhanced the chances to bring together for this area of study frequently scattered information.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Further, with regard to the availability of such assets, the enhanced openness of this model is particularly important to <span>Cornwell's (1996, p. 304)</span>. Concern that “no-fee access to government information would need to remain the cornerstone of any depository program.”</p><p>This article reports a similar focused endeavor that involves the digital resources pertaining to treaties between the federal government and the American Indian tribes. It is a demonstration of the intersection of technology and of legal materials and data that have facilitated recent investigations of jurisprudence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of government information : an international review of policy, issues and resources","volume":"30 5","pages":"Pages 637-647"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jgi.2004.10.007","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of government information : an international review of policy, issues and resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352023704000747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
In a thorough analysis of researching the regulation of the banking industry in the United States, Zoller (2000). Demonstrated a number of paths among federal documents of various agencies within the Department of the Treasury, including the legislation that created these entities, and to relevant online resources. This latter opportunity included electronic access to several traditional reporting vehicles: for example, the Congressional Record, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, United States Code, Statutes at Large, and decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court. This leveraged ability to search among digitized versions of these materials has expedited research in the banking industry and has enhanced the chances to bring together for this area of study frequently scattered information.1 Further, with regard to the availability of such assets, the enhanced openness of this model is particularly important to Cornwell's (1996, p. 304). Concern that “no-fee access to government information would need to remain the cornerstone of any depository program.”
This article reports a similar focused endeavor that involves the digital resources pertaining to treaties between the federal government and the American Indian tribes. It is a demonstration of the intersection of technology and of legal materials and data that have facilitated recent investigations of jurisprudence.
在对美国银行业监管研究的深入分析中,Zoller(2000)。在财政部各机构的联邦文件中展示了一些路径,包括创建这些实体的立法,以及相关的在线资源。后一种机会包括对几个传统报告工具的电子访问:例如,国会记录、联邦公报、联邦法规法典、美国法典、总体法规和美国最高法院的决定。这种在这些材料的数字化版本中搜索的杠杆能力加速了银行业的研究,并增加了将这一研究领域经常分散的信息汇集在一起的机会此外,关于这些资产的可用性,该模型的增强开放性对Cornwell (1996, p. 304)尤为重要。担心“免费获取政府信息仍将是任何存款计划的基石”。本文报告了一个类似的集中努力,涉及与联邦政府和美洲印第安部落之间的条约有关的数字资源。它展示了技术与法律材料和数据的交叉,这些材料和数据促进了最近的法理学研究。