Federal Indian law Internet tools: Indian Territory Cases at the Oklahoma State Courts Network and Kappler's Indian Affairs: Laws and Treaties at the Oklahoma State University

Charles D. Bernholz
{"title":"Federal Indian law Internet tools: Indian Territory Cases at the Oklahoma State Courts Network and Kappler's Indian Affairs: Laws and Treaties at the Oklahoma State University","authors":"Charles D. Bernholz","doi":"10.1016/j.jgi.2004.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In a thorough analysis of researching the regulation of the banking industry in the United States, <span>Zoller (2000)</span>. Demonstrated a number of paths among federal documents of various agencies within the Department of the Treasury, including the legislation that created these entities, and to relevant online resources. This latter opportunity included electronic access to several traditional reporting vehicles: for example, the <em>Congressional Record</em>, <em>Federal Register</em>, <em>Code of Federal Regulations</em>, <em>United States Code</em>, <em>Statutes at Large</em>, and decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court. This leveraged ability to search among digitized versions of these materials has expedited research in the banking industry and has enhanced the chances to bring together for this area of study frequently scattered information.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Further, with regard to the availability of such assets, the enhanced openness of this model is particularly important to <span>Cornwell's (1996, p. 304)</span>. Concern that “no-fee access to government information would need to remain the cornerstone of any depository program.”</p><p>This article reports a similar focused endeavor that involves the digital resources pertaining to treaties between the federal government and the American Indian tribes. It is a demonstration of the intersection of technology and of legal materials and data that have facilitated recent investigations of jurisprudence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of government information : an international review of policy, issues and resources","volume":"30 5","pages":"Pages 637-647"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jgi.2004.10.007","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of government information : an international review of policy, issues and resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352023704000747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In a thorough analysis of researching the regulation of the banking industry in the United States, Zoller (2000). Demonstrated a number of paths among federal documents of various agencies within the Department of the Treasury, including the legislation that created these entities, and to relevant online resources. This latter opportunity included electronic access to several traditional reporting vehicles: for example, the Congressional Record, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, United States Code, Statutes at Large, and decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court. This leveraged ability to search among digitized versions of these materials has expedited research in the banking industry and has enhanced the chances to bring together for this area of study frequently scattered information.1 Further, with regard to the availability of such assets, the enhanced openness of this model is particularly important to Cornwell's (1996, p. 304). Concern that “no-fee access to government information would need to remain the cornerstone of any depository program.”

This article reports a similar focused endeavor that involves the digital resources pertaining to treaties between the federal government and the American Indian tribes. It is a demonstration of the intersection of technology and of legal materials and data that have facilitated recent investigations of jurisprudence.

联邦印第安法律互联网工具:俄克拉何马州法院网络的印第安领土案件和卡普勒的印第安事务:俄克拉何马州立大学的法律和条约
在对美国银行业监管研究的深入分析中,Zoller(2000)。在财政部各机构的联邦文件中展示了一些路径,包括创建这些实体的立法,以及相关的在线资源。后一种机会包括对几个传统报告工具的电子访问:例如,国会记录、联邦公报、联邦法规法典、美国法典、总体法规和美国最高法院的决定。这种在这些材料的数字化版本中搜索的杠杆能力加速了银行业的研究,并增加了将这一研究领域经常分散的信息汇集在一起的机会此外,关于这些资产的可用性,该模型的增强开放性对Cornwell (1996, p. 304)尤为重要。担心“免费获取政府信息仍将是任何存款计划的基石”。本文报告了一个类似的集中努力,涉及与联邦政府和美洲印第安部落之间的条约有关的数字资源。它展示了技术与法律材料和数据的交叉,这些材料和数据促进了最近的法理学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信