Interrelaciones de los atributos del producto y las preferencias intransitivas

Zoltán Veres , Petra Platz , Tamás Tarján
{"title":"Interrelaciones de los atributos del producto y las preferencias intransitivas","authors":"Zoltán Veres ,&nbsp;Petra Platz ,&nbsp;Tamás Tarján","doi":"10.1016/j.iedee.2014.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Consumers are thought to be rational in their choices. But sometimes their choices comprise intransitivities. Current paper presents a mathematically supported experimental study of consumers’ intransitive preferences concerning product attributes. We used a personalized experimental design developed on the basis of Q methodology to maintain subjectivity. In our experimental study we are investigating intransitivity occurring in participants’ preferences during selection between simple, medium complex, and complex products. By the Q method we gain the same number of less important (middle level) attribute dimensions for all participants. The participants’ task is to make pairwise comparisons of preference between specific realizations of each product group. Since conjoint analysis is based on the measurement and testing of consumer preferences, reassessment of the phenomenon may have impact on marketing research methodology. This research is to test an experimental design which—with some adjustment—could be able to measure revealed preferences in a more precise way.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":30125,"journal":{"name":"Investigaciones Europeas de Direccion y Economia de la Empresa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.iedee.2014.01.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigaciones Europeas de Direccion y Economia de la Empresa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1135252314000069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumers are thought to be rational in their choices. But sometimes their choices comprise intransitivities. Current paper presents a mathematically supported experimental study of consumers’ intransitive preferences concerning product attributes. We used a personalized experimental design developed on the basis of Q methodology to maintain subjectivity. In our experimental study we are investigating intransitivity occurring in participants’ preferences during selection between simple, medium complex, and complex products. By the Q method we gain the same number of less important (middle level) attribute dimensions for all participants. The participants’ task is to make pairwise comparisons of preference between specific realizations of each product group. Since conjoint analysis is based on the measurement and testing of consumer preferences, reassessment of the phenomenon may have impact on marketing research methodology. This research is to test an experimental design which—with some adjustment—could be able to measure revealed preferences in a more precise way.

产品属性和不及物偏好的相互关系
人们认为消费者的选择是理性的。但有时他们的选择包含不及物性。本文提出了一个数学支持的实验研究消费者的不及物偏好与产品属性。我们使用了基于Q方法开发的个性化实验设计,以保持主观性。在我们的实验研究中,我们正在调查参与者在简单、中等复杂和复杂产品之间选择时的偏好。通过Q方法,我们为所有参与者获得相同数量的不太重要的(中级)属性维度。参与者的任务是对每个产品组的特定实现之间的偏好进行两两比较。由于联合分析是基于对消费者偏好的测量和测试,因此对这种现象的重新评估可能会对营销研究方法产生影响。这项研究是为了测试一种实验设计——经过一些调整——能够以更精确的方式测量显示的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信