Desarrollo y desempeño en equipos de proyecto: validez incremental de la escala de desarrollo grupal

IF 0.6 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY
José Navarro , Rocío Meneses , Miquel Nadal , Edwald Landsberger
{"title":"Desarrollo y desempeño en equipos de proyecto: validez incremental de la escala de desarrollo grupal","authors":"José Navarro ,&nbsp;Rocío Meneses ,&nbsp;Miquel Nadal ,&nbsp;Edwald Landsberger","doi":"10.1016/j.anpsic.2016.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We carry out a study about how the development achieved by a group is a key determinant of the performance in project teams. The group development scale (EDG) and the group development questionnaire (GDQ) were applied to 30 project teams using different subjective criteria to evaluate their performance (i.e. self-reported effectiveness, satisfaction of needs’ members, internal operations and maintenance). By carrying out a cross sectional study, and controlling for group size, group development was able to predict some of these criteria of performance such as self-reported effectiveness (23% of explained variance) and the satisfaction of needs (53% of variance explained). Similarly, with regard to an overall measure of team performance, group development accounted for 40% of its variance. In addition, the EDG showed incremental validity relative to GDQ (<em>F</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->5,84, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.01) to predict team performance. Finally, we also discuss how to contribute to group development as a way to achieve more effective teams.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44066,"journal":{"name":"Anuario de Psicologia","volume":"46 1","pages":"Pages 8-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.anpsic.2016.06.002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuario de Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0066512616300022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We carry out a study about how the development achieved by a group is a key determinant of the performance in project teams. The group development scale (EDG) and the group development questionnaire (GDQ) were applied to 30 project teams using different subjective criteria to evaluate their performance (i.e. self-reported effectiveness, satisfaction of needs’ members, internal operations and maintenance). By carrying out a cross sectional study, and controlling for group size, group development was able to predict some of these criteria of performance such as self-reported effectiveness (23% of explained variance) and the satisfaction of needs (53% of variance explained). Similarly, with regard to an overall measure of team performance, group development accounted for 40% of its variance. In addition, the EDG showed incremental validity relative to GDQ (F = 5,84, p < .01) to predict team performance. Finally, we also discuss how to contribute to group development as a way to achieve more effective teams.

项目团队的发展与绩效:团队发展量表的增量效度
我们进行了一项研究,关于一个团队的发展如何成为项目团队绩效的关键决定因素。团队发展量表(EDG)和团队发展问卷(GDQ)应用于30个项目团队,使用不同的主观标准评估他们的绩效(即自我报告的有效性,需求成员的满意度,内部操作和维护)。通过进行横断面研究,并控制群体规模,群体发展能够预测一些这些绩效标准,如自我报告的有效性(23%的解释方差)和需求的满意度(53%的解释方差)。同样,对于团队绩效的总体衡量,团队发展占其方差的40%。此外,EDG相对于GDQ表现出递增的效度(F = 5,84, p <.01)来预测团队绩效。最后,我们还讨论了如何为团队发展做出贡献,以实现更有效的团队。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Anuario de Psicología, one of Spain"s most important general psychology journals, is published by the Faculty of Psychology of the University of Barcelona. It appears three times a year. The Anuario combines continuity with the past with a strong commitment to the present and the future. The journal is broad-ranging, interdisciplinary, and innovative. The Anuario publishes research reports and applied studies in all fields of psychology. We also accept theorical, epistemological studies, organize dossiers on topical themes, and hold debates on controversial subjects deriving from a central article.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信