Accessing voluntary assisted dying in regional Western Australia: early reflections from key stakeholders.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rural and remote health Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-26 DOI:10.22605/RRH8024
Casey M Haining, Lindy Willmott, Ben P White
{"title":"Accessing voluntary assisted dying in regional Western Australia: early reflections from key stakeholders.","authors":"Casey M Haining, Lindy Willmott, Ben P White","doi":"10.22605/RRH8024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most Australian jurisdictions have passed voluntary assisted dying (VAD) laws, with some regimes already in operation. Inequitable access to assisted dying in regional communities has been described internationally. Although regional access to VAD has been identified as a concern in Australia, to date it has been understudied empirically. Western Australia (WA) was the second Australian jurisdiction to pass and implement VAD laws. Due to the vast geography of WA (and the potential for such geography to exacerbate regional access inequities) several initiatives were introduced to try to mitigate such inequities. This article aims to explore the effectiveness of these initiatives, and report on regional provision of VAD in WA more generally, by drawing on the early experiences and reflections of key stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 27 semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 participants belonging to four main stakeholder groups: patients and families, health practitioners, regulators and VAD system personnel, and health and professional organisation representatives. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis led to the description of four main themes: the importance of the Regional Access Support Scheme, the need for local providers, the role of telehealth in VAD provision and the impact of distance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early experiences and reflections of key stakeholders suggest that while many of the regional initiatives implemented by WA are largely effective in addressing regional access inequities, challenges for regional VAD provision and access remain.</p>","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural and remote health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH8024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Most Australian jurisdictions have passed voluntary assisted dying (VAD) laws, with some regimes already in operation. Inequitable access to assisted dying in regional communities has been described internationally. Although regional access to VAD has been identified as a concern in Australia, to date it has been understudied empirically. Western Australia (WA) was the second Australian jurisdiction to pass and implement VAD laws. Due to the vast geography of WA (and the potential for such geography to exacerbate regional access inequities) several initiatives were introduced to try to mitigate such inequities. This article aims to explore the effectiveness of these initiatives, and report on regional provision of VAD in WA more generally, by drawing on the early experiences and reflections of key stakeholders.

Methods: A total of 27 semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 participants belonging to four main stakeholder groups: patients and families, health practitioners, regulators and VAD system personnel, and health and professional organisation representatives. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results: Data analysis led to the description of four main themes: the importance of the Regional Access Support Scheme, the need for local providers, the role of telehealth in VAD provision and the impact of distance.

Conclusion: Early experiences and reflections of key stakeholders suggest that while many of the regional initiatives implemented by WA are largely effective in addressing regional access inequities, challenges for regional VAD provision and access remain.

在西澳大利亚地区获得自愿协助死亡:主要利益攸关方的早期思考。
引言:大多数澳大利亚司法管辖区都通过了自愿协助死亡(VAD)法,一些制度已经开始实施。国际上已经描述了区域社区获得协助死亡的不公平机会。尽管在澳大利亚,区域获得VAD已被确定为一个令人担忧的问题,但迄今为止,这一问题在经验上研究不足。西澳大利亚州是澳大利亚第二个通过并实施VAD法律的司法管辖区。由于西澳州的地理位置广阔(以及这种地理位置可能加剧区域准入不平等),采取了一些举措来缓解这种不平等。本文旨在通过借鉴主要利益相关者的早期经验和思考,探讨这些举措的有效性,并更广泛地报告西澳州VAD的区域提供情况。方法:共对来自四个主要利益相关者群体的29名参与者进行了27次半结构化访谈:患者和家庭、卫生从业者、监管机构和VAD系统人员,以及卫生和专业组织代表。访谈被逐字转录,并使用归纳主题分析进行分析。结果:数据分析导致对四个主题的描述:区域获取支持计划的重要性、对当地提供者的需求、远程医疗在提供VAD中的作用以及距离的影响。结论:主要利益攸关方的早期经验和思考表明,尽管西澳州实施的许多区域举措在很大程度上有效地解决了区域获取不平等问题,但区域VAD的提供和获取仍然面临挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rural and remote health
Rural and remote health Rural Health-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rural and Remote Health is a not-for-profit, online-only, peer-reviewed academic publication. It aims to further rural and remote health education, research and practice. The primary purpose of the Journal is to publish and so provide an international knowledge-base of peer-reviewed material from rural health practitioners (medical, nursing and allied health professionals and health workers), educators, researchers and policy makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信