[The Change in Antimicrobial Resistance During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Türkiye].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
Nisel Yılmaz, Gülşen Altınkanat Gelmez, Güner Söyletir
{"title":"[The Change in Antimicrobial Resistance During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Türkiye].","authors":"Nisel Yılmaz,&nbsp;Gülşen Altınkanat Gelmez,&nbsp;Güner Söyletir","doi":"10.5578/mb.20239943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the most important problems threatening human health worldwide. The impact of the Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on AMR continues to be discussed. Some researchers argue that the pandemic will increase AMR rates, while others suggest the opposite. The aim of this study was to investigate the change in AMR of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus strains in three cross-sectional periods in Türkiye, the first one before the COVID-19 pandemic, the second and the third one during the pandemic. The change in antibiotic susceptibility in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from urine, blood, and lower respiratory tract samples of patients hospitalized in intensive care units and wards of hospitals before (November 2019) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (November 2020 and July 2021) was investigated in this study. A total of 17 voluntary hospitals, members of the Antibiotic Susceptibility Surveillance Study Group (ADSI) of the Society for Clinical Microbiology Specialists (KLIMUD), participated in the study. Identification of bacteria was performed with automated bacterial identification systems (VITEK2, bioMérieux, France or Phoenix, BD, USA). Antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed in one center with the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method and in other centers with automated antibiotic susceptibility test systems (VITEK2, bioMérieux, France or Phoenix, BD, USA), and the results were evaluated according to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) criteria. Antibiotic susceptibility ratios were statistically analyzed using either the chi-square or Fisher's exact test. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Antibiotic susceptibility test results of a total of 4030 strains; 1152, 1139, and 1739 belonging to November 2019, November 2020, and July 2021, respectively; were examined. While cefotaxime and ceftazidime susceptibility rates in E.coli strains increased during the pandemic period compared to previous period (p= 0.04, p= 0.001, respectively); nitrofurantoin sensitivity (p= 0.02) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) ratios (p< 0.001) were found to be decreased. It was determined that the susceptibility rates of all other examined antimicrobials did not change statistically. It was observed that the susceptibility rates of all antibiotics in K.pneumoniae isolates decreased during the pandemic period, but the ESBL rates increased between 2019-2020 (p= 0.01) and decreased between 2020-2021 (p= 0.02). It was found that ESBL rates increased before and after the pandemic. It was observed that the susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (p= 0.0001), levofloxacin (p= 0.003), and gentamicin (p= 0.005) in S.aureus strains increased during the pandemic period. No significant changes were observed in other antibiotic susceptibility rates. Methicillin resistance of S.aureus (MRSA) strains decreased between 2019-2020 (p= 0.03) and increased again in 2021 (p= 0.04) and returned to the pre-pandemic rate. Our study results suggest that the measures taken to reduce the spread of COVID-19 with the pandemic (such as quarantine practices, increased hand hygiene, mask use, and national/international travel restriction) may reduce the spread of bacteria such as ESBL-producing E.coli and the rate of MRSA, which is considered as a hand hygiene indicator. The increase in the later stages of the pandemic recalls the relaxation in compliance with hand hygiene rules. The decrease in the susceptibility rate of K.pneumoniae isolates to antibiotics and the increase in the ESBL rate may be due to inappropriate and excessive use of antibiotics during the pandemic period. However, we believe that these data should be supported by studies to be conducted nowadays when all the rules and measures are back as if the pandemic has ended.</p>","PeriodicalId":18509,"journal":{"name":"Mikrobiyoloji bulteni","volume":"57 4","pages":"507-534"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mikrobiyoloji bulteni","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/mb.20239943","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the most important problems threatening human health worldwide. The impact of the Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on AMR continues to be discussed. Some researchers argue that the pandemic will increase AMR rates, while others suggest the opposite. The aim of this study was to investigate the change in AMR of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus strains in three cross-sectional periods in Türkiye, the first one before the COVID-19 pandemic, the second and the third one during the pandemic. The change in antibiotic susceptibility in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from urine, blood, and lower respiratory tract samples of patients hospitalized in intensive care units and wards of hospitals before (November 2019) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (November 2020 and July 2021) was investigated in this study. A total of 17 voluntary hospitals, members of the Antibiotic Susceptibility Surveillance Study Group (ADSI) of the Society for Clinical Microbiology Specialists (KLIMUD), participated in the study. Identification of bacteria was performed with automated bacterial identification systems (VITEK2, bioMérieux, France or Phoenix, BD, USA). Antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed in one center with the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method and in other centers with automated antibiotic susceptibility test systems (VITEK2, bioMérieux, France or Phoenix, BD, USA), and the results were evaluated according to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) criteria. Antibiotic susceptibility ratios were statistically analyzed using either the chi-square or Fisher's exact test. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Antibiotic susceptibility test results of a total of 4030 strains; 1152, 1139, and 1739 belonging to November 2019, November 2020, and July 2021, respectively; were examined. While cefotaxime and ceftazidime susceptibility rates in E.coli strains increased during the pandemic period compared to previous period (p= 0.04, p= 0.001, respectively); nitrofurantoin sensitivity (p= 0.02) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) ratios (p< 0.001) were found to be decreased. It was determined that the susceptibility rates of all other examined antimicrobials did not change statistically. It was observed that the susceptibility rates of all antibiotics in K.pneumoniae isolates decreased during the pandemic period, but the ESBL rates increased between 2019-2020 (p= 0.01) and decreased between 2020-2021 (p= 0.02). It was found that ESBL rates increased before and after the pandemic. It was observed that the susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (p= 0.0001), levofloxacin (p= 0.003), and gentamicin (p= 0.005) in S.aureus strains increased during the pandemic period. No significant changes were observed in other antibiotic susceptibility rates. Methicillin resistance of S.aureus (MRSA) strains decreased between 2019-2020 (p= 0.03) and increased again in 2021 (p= 0.04) and returned to the pre-pandemic rate. Our study results suggest that the measures taken to reduce the spread of COVID-19 with the pandemic (such as quarantine practices, increased hand hygiene, mask use, and national/international travel restriction) may reduce the spread of bacteria such as ESBL-producing E.coli and the rate of MRSA, which is considered as a hand hygiene indicator. The increase in the later stages of the pandemic recalls the relaxation in compliance with hand hygiene rules. The decrease in the susceptibility rate of K.pneumoniae isolates to antibiotics and the increase in the ESBL rate may be due to inappropriate and excessive use of antibiotics during the pandemic period. However, we believe that these data should be supported by studies to be conducted nowadays when all the rules and measures are back as if the pandemic has ended.

[土耳其新冠肺炎大流行期间抗菌药物耐药性的变化]。
抗微生物耐药性(AMR)是世界范围内威胁人类健康的最重要问题之一。2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)大流行对AMR的影响仍在讨论中。一些研究人员认为,新冠疫情将增加AMR发病率,而另一些研究人员则认为情况恰恰相反。本研究的目的是调查土耳其大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和金黄色葡萄球菌在三个横断面期间AMR的变化,第一个横断面在新冠肺炎大流行前,第二个横断面和第三个横断面在大流行期间。本研究调查了新冠肺炎大流行之前(2019年11月)和期间(2020年11月和2021年7月)在医院重症监护室和病房住院的患者的尿液、血液和下呼吸道样本中分离的大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和金黄色葡萄球菌菌株的抗生素敏感性变化。共有17家志愿医院参与了这项研究,它们是临床微生物学专家学会(KLIMUD)抗生素易感性监测研究小组(ADSI)的成员。使用自动细菌鉴定系统(VITEK2,bioMérieux,法国或Phoenix,BD,美国)进行细菌鉴定。在一个中心使用Kirby-Bauer圆盘扩散法进行抗生素敏感性测试,在其他中心使用自动抗生素敏感性测试系统(VITEK2,bioMérieux,法国或Phoenix,BD,美国)进行抗生素易感性测试,并根据欧洲抗微生物药敏测试委员会(EUCAST)标准对结果进行评估。使用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验对抗生素敏感率进行统计分析。p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。共4030株菌株的抗生素敏感性试验结果;分别属于2019年11月、2020年11月和2021年7月的1152、1139和1739;检查。与前一时期相比,疫情期间大肠杆菌菌株中头孢噻肟和头孢他啶的易感性增加(分别为p=0.04和p=0.001);呋喃妥因敏感性(p=0.02)和超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)比值(p<0.001)降低。已经确定,所有其他检查的抗菌药物的易感性率在统计学上没有变化。研究发现,肺炎克雷伯菌分离株对所有抗生素的易感性在疫情期间都有所下降,但ESBL率在2019-2020年期间增加(p=0.01),在2020-2021年期间下降(p=0.02)。观察到,在疫情期间,金黄色葡萄球菌菌株对环丙沙星(p=0.0001)、左氧氟沙星(p=0.003)和庆大霉素(p=0.005)的易感性增加。其他抗生素敏感率未观察到显著变化。2019-2020年间,金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)菌株的甲氧西林耐药性下降(p=0.03),2021年再次上升(p=0.04),并恢复到疫情前的水平。我们的研究结果表明,为减少新冠肺炎随疫情的传播而采取的措施(如隔离措施、加强手部卫生、口罩使用和国家/国际旅行限制)可能会减少细菌的传播,如产ESBL大肠杆菌和MRSA的发病率,MRSA被视为手部卫生指标。疫情后期的增加让人想起了遵守手部卫生规则的放松。肺炎克雷伯菌对抗生素的易感性降低和ESBL率增加可能是由于在大流行期间不适当和过度使用抗生素。然而,我们认为,这些数据应该得到今天进行的研究的支持,因为所有的规则和措施都回来了,就好像疫情已经结束一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mikrobiyoloji bulteni
Mikrobiyoloji bulteni 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Microbiology is the scientific official publication of Ankara Microbiology Society. It is published quarterly in January, April, July and October. The aim of Bulletin of Microbiology is to publish high quality scientific research articles on the subjects of medical and clinical microbiology. In addition, review articles, short communications and reports, case reports, editorials, letters to editor and other training-oriented scientific materials are also accepted. Publishing language is Turkish with a comprehensive English abstract. The editorial policy of the journal is based on independent, unbiased, and double-blinded peer-review. Specialists of medical and/or clinical microbiology, infectious disease and public health, and clinicians and researchers who are training and interesting with those subjects, are the target groups of Bulletin of Microbiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信