[In vitro Activity of Rifabutin and Clofazimine to Macrolide-Resistant Mycobacterium abscessus Complex Clinical Isolates].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
Süheyla Sürücüoğlu, Nuri Özkütük, Hörü Gazi, Cengiz Çavuşoğlu
{"title":"[In vitro Activity of Rifabutin and Clofazimine to Macrolide-Resistant Mycobacterium abscessus Complex Clinical Isolates].","authors":"Süheyla Sürücüoğlu,&nbsp;Nuri Özkütük,&nbsp;Hörü Gazi,&nbsp;Cengiz Çavuşoğlu","doi":"10.5578/mb.20239951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABSC) is one of the most resistant bacteria against antimicrobial agents. The number of agents that can be used by oral route, such as macrolides, is limited in antimicrobial therapy. In recent years, rifabutin and clofazimine have gained importance as they can be administered by oral route and have shown synergistic effects with macrolides and aminoglycosides. The aim of this study was to determine the in vitro activity of rifabutin and clofazimine against clinical isolates of MABSC resistant to macrolides. A total of 48 MABSC isolates obtained from respiratory tract and other clinical samples in the Tuberculosis Laboratories of the Faculty of Medicine of Manisa Celal Bayar and Ege Universities were included in the study. Subspecies differentiation and aminoglycoside and macrolide resistance of the isolates were determined by GenoType NTM-DR test. Rifabutin and clofazimine susceptibilities were determined by standard broth microdilution method. Of the MABSC isolates 42 were identified as M.abscessus subsp. abscessus, three as M.abscessus subsp. bolletii and three as M.abscessus subsp. massiliense. None of the isolates exhibited rrs and rrl mutations indicating acquired macrolide resistance and aminoglycoside resistance. However, the erm(41) T28 genotype which is associated with inducible macrolide resistance was detected in 41 (85%) of the strains. All M.abscessus subsp. massiliense isolates were found to be genotypically susceptible to macrolides. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range values for rifabutin were 0.0625 to 32 µg/mL, while for clofazimine, the range was 0.0625 to 1 µg/mL. Rifabutin MIC values were significantly higher (mean 5.98 µg/mL vs 0.5 µg/mL, p= 0.026) in the isolates with macrolide resistance. There was no correlation between macrolide resistance and clofazimine MIC values (mean 0.25 µg/mL vs. 0.214 µg/mL, p= 0.758). The MIC50 and MIC90 values for rifabutin were 1 and 8 µg/mL, respectively, while for clofazimine they were 0.25 and 0.5 µg/mL. Macrolide resistance was found to be higher in isolates with rifabutin MIC values above the MIC50 value (p= 0.045). In conclusion, the determination of higher rifabutin MIC values in isolates resistant to macrolides suggested that susceptibility testing should be performed before adding rifabutin to the treatment regimen. The low MIC values of clofazimine in all strains indicated that it may be used as a first choice in the combination therapy. However, further studies using a larger number of clinical isolates and applying genotypic and phenotypic susceptibility tests are needed to determine threshold MIC values to assist clinicians in making treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18509,"journal":{"name":"Mikrobiyoloji bulteni","volume":"57 4","pages":"639-649"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mikrobiyoloji bulteni","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/mb.20239951","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABSC) is one of the most resistant bacteria against antimicrobial agents. The number of agents that can be used by oral route, such as macrolides, is limited in antimicrobial therapy. In recent years, rifabutin and clofazimine have gained importance as they can be administered by oral route and have shown synergistic effects with macrolides and aminoglycosides. The aim of this study was to determine the in vitro activity of rifabutin and clofazimine against clinical isolates of MABSC resistant to macrolides. A total of 48 MABSC isolates obtained from respiratory tract and other clinical samples in the Tuberculosis Laboratories of the Faculty of Medicine of Manisa Celal Bayar and Ege Universities were included in the study. Subspecies differentiation and aminoglycoside and macrolide resistance of the isolates were determined by GenoType NTM-DR test. Rifabutin and clofazimine susceptibilities were determined by standard broth microdilution method. Of the MABSC isolates 42 were identified as M.abscessus subsp. abscessus, three as M.abscessus subsp. bolletii and three as M.abscessus subsp. massiliense. None of the isolates exhibited rrs and rrl mutations indicating acquired macrolide resistance and aminoglycoside resistance. However, the erm(41) T28 genotype which is associated with inducible macrolide resistance was detected in 41 (85%) of the strains. All M.abscessus subsp. massiliense isolates were found to be genotypically susceptible to macrolides. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range values for rifabutin were 0.0625 to 32 µg/mL, while for clofazimine, the range was 0.0625 to 1 µg/mL. Rifabutin MIC values were significantly higher (mean 5.98 µg/mL vs 0.5 µg/mL, p= 0.026) in the isolates with macrolide resistance. There was no correlation between macrolide resistance and clofazimine MIC values (mean 0.25 µg/mL vs. 0.214 µg/mL, p= 0.758). The MIC50 and MIC90 values for rifabutin were 1 and 8 µg/mL, respectively, while for clofazimine they were 0.25 and 0.5 µg/mL. Macrolide resistance was found to be higher in isolates with rifabutin MIC values above the MIC50 value (p= 0.045). In conclusion, the determination of higher rifabutin MIC values in isolates resistant to macrolides suggested that susceptibility testing should be performed before adding rifabutin to the treatment regimen. The low MIC values of clofazimine in all strains indicated that it may be used as a first choice in the combination therapy. However, further studies using a larger number of clinical isolates and applying genotypic and phenotypic susceptibility tests are needed to determine threshold MIC values to assist clinicians in making treatment decisions.

[利福定和氯法齐明对大环内酯耐药脓肿分枝杆菌复合临床分离株的体外活性]。
脓肿分枝杆菌复合体(MABSC)是对抗菌药物最具耐药性的细菌之一。可通过口服途径使用的药物数量,如大环内酯类药物,在抗菌治疗中是有限的。近年来,利福布汀和氯法齐明因可通过口服途径给药而变得越来越重要,并显示出与大环内酯类和氨基糖苷类的协同作用。本研究的目的是测定利福布汀和氯法齐明对大环内酯类药物耐药的MABSC临床分离株的体外活性。该研究共包括从Manisa Celal Bayar大学和Ege大学医学院结核病实验室的呼吸道和其他临床样本中获得的48个MABSC分离株。用NTM-DR基因型试验测定分离株的亚群分化及对氨基糖苷类和大环内酯类的抗性。用标准肉汤微量稀释法测定利福定和氯法齐明的敏感性。在MABSC分离株中,42株被鉴定为脓肿分枝杆菌亚种。脓肿分枝杆菌,3个为脓肿分枝杆菌亚种。bolletii和三个为M.absessus亚种。massiliense。没有一个分离株表现出rrs和rrl突变,表明获得性大环内酯类耐药性和氨基糖苷类耐药性。然而,在41株(85%)菌株中检测到与诱导型大环内酯类耐药性相关的erm(41)T28基因型。所有脓肿分枝杆菌亚种。发现马西林酶分离株在基因型上对大环内酯类药物敏感。利福布汀的最小抑菌浓度(MIC)范围值为0.0625至32µg/mL,而氯法齐明的最低抑菌浓度范围为0.0625到1µg/mL。在具有大环内酯类耐药性的分离株中,利福定的MIC值显著更高(平均5.98µg/mL vs 0.5µg/mL,p=0.026)。大环内酯类耐药性与氯法齐明的MIC值之间没有相关性(平均0.25µg/mL vs.0.214µg/mL,p=0.758)。利福布汀的MIC50和MIC90值分别为1和8µg/mL;而氯法齐明的MIC50值和MIC90为0.25和0.5µg/mL。利福布汀MIC值高于MIC50值的分离株对大环内酯类药物的耐药性更高(p=0.045)。总之,对大环唑类药物耐药的分离株中利福布丁MIC值更高的测定表明,在将利福布廷加入治疗方案之前,应进行药敏试验。氯法齐明在所有菌株中的MIC值都很低,这表明它可以作为联合治疗的首选药物。然而,需要使用更多临床分离株并应用基因型和表型易感性测试进行进一步研究,以确定MIC阈值,从而帮助临床医生做出治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mikrobiyoloji bulteni
Mikrobiyoloji bulteni 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Microbiology is the scientific official publication of Ankara Microbiology Society. It is published quarterly in January, April, July and October. The aim of Bulletin of Microbiology is to publish high quality scientific research articles on the subjects of medical and clinical microbiology. In addition, review articles, short communications and reports, case reports, editorials, letters to editor and other training-oriented scientific materials are also accepted. Publishing language is Turkish with a comprehensive English abstract. The editorial policy of the journal is based on independent, unbiased, and double-blinded peer-review. Specialists of medical and/or clinical microbiology, infectious disease and public health, and clinicians and researchers who are training and interesting with those subjects, are the target groups of Bulletin of Microbiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信