Situational anxiety in head and neck cancer: Rates, patterns and clinical management interventions in a regional cancer setting

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Erin Forbes B Psych (Hons), Kerrie Clover PhD, MPsych (Clin), Sharon Oultram RT(T), MSc(Ed), MPhil(Research), Chris Wratten BMedSci, MBBS, FRANZCR, Mahesh Kumar MD, DNB, FRANZCR, Minh Thi Tieu MBBS, Bsc(Med), FRANZCR, Gregory Carter MBBS, FRANZCP, Cert Child Psych, PhD, Kristen McCarter PhD Clin Psych, B Psych (Hons), Ben Britton BPhD, DClin Health Psych, BScEconSocSc, Amanda L. Baker PhD, MPsych (Clin)
{"title":"Situational anxiety in head and neck cancer: Rates, patterns and clinical management interventions in a regional cancer setting","authors":"Erin Forbes B Psych (Hons),&nbsp;Kerrie Clover PhD, MPsych (Clin),&nbsp;Sharon Oultram RT(T), MSc(Ed), MPhil(Research),&nbsp;Chris Wratten BMedSci, MBBS, FRANZCR,&nbsp;Mahesh Kumar MD, DNB, FRANZCR,&nbsp;Minh Thi Tieu MBBS, Bsc(Med), FRANZCR,&nbsp;Gregory Carter MBBS, FRANZCP, Cert Child Psych, PhD,&nbsp;Kristen McCarter PhD Clin Psych, B Psych (Hons),&nbsp;Ben Britton BPhD, DClin Health Psych, BScEconSocSc,&nbsp;Amanda L. Baker PhD, MPsych (Clin)","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Research indicates that the immobilisation mask required for radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancers can provoke intense anxiety. However, little is known about the rates of this anxiety, whether it changes over a course of treatment and how it is managed in clinical practice. This study aimed to describe the rates and patterns of situational anxiety in patients undergoing RT for head and neck cancer and the use of anxiety management interventions in current clinical practice in a major regional cancer setting in New South Wales, Australia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Situational anxiety rates and patterns were assessed at five time points using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory prior to treatment planning (SIM), the first three treatment sessions (Tx 1, Tx 2 and Tx 3) and treatment 20 (Tx 20). Sessions were observed to record the use of general supportive interventions (music and support person) and anxiety-specific interventions (break from the mask, relaxation techniques and anxiolytic medication). Sociodemographic and clinical information was extracted from the medical record.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>One hundred and one patients were recruited. One-third had clinically significant anxiety at any of the first three time points (33.3–40%), and a quarter at Tx 3 (26.4%) and Tx 20 (23.4%). Of the sample, 55.4% had available data for categorisation into one of four pattern groups: ‘No Anxiety’ (46.4%); ‘Decreasing Anxiety’ (35.7%); ‘Increasing Anxiety’ (7.1%); and ‘Stable High Anxiety’ (10.7%). Most participants had social support present at SIM (53.5%) and listened to music during treatment (86.7–92.9%). Few participants received relaxation techniques alone (1.2–2.3%). Anxiolytic medication was provided for 10% of patients at some stage during the treatment journey and 5% required a break from the mask at SIM, with frequency decreasing throughout the treatment course.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In this regional cancer setting, situational anxiety was common, but generally decreased throughout treatment. Some patients experience persistent or increasing anxiety, with up to 10% of patients receiving specific anxiety management interventions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":"71 1","pages":"100-109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmrs.736","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmrs.736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Research indicates that the immobilisation mask required for radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancers can provoke intense anxiety. However, little is known about the rates of this anxiety, whether it changes over a course of treatment and how it is managed in clinical practice. This study aimed to describe the rates and patterns of situational anxiety in patients undergoing RT for head and neck cancer and the use of anxiety management interventions in current clinical practice in a major regional cancer setting in New South Wales, Australia.

Methods

Situational anxiety rates and patterns were assessed at five time points using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory prior to treatment planning (SIM), the first three treatment sessions (Tx 1, Tx 2 and Tx 3) and treatment 20 (Tx 20). Sessions were observed to record the use of general supportive interventions (music and support person) and anxiety-specific interventions (break from the mask, relaxation techniques and anxiolytic medication). Sociodemographic and clinical information was extracted from the medical record.

Results

One hundred and one patients were recruited. One-third had clinically significant anxiety at any of the first three time points (33.3–40%), and a quarter at Tx 3 (26.4%) and Tx 20 (23.4%). Of the sample, 55.4% had available data for categorisation into one of four pattern groups: ‘No Anxiety’ (46.4%); ‘Decreasing Anxiety’ (35.7%); ‘Increasing Anxiety’ (7.1%); and ‘Stable High Anxiety’ (10.7%). Most participants had social support present at SIM (53.5%) and listened to music during treatment (86.7–92.9%). Few participants received relaxation techniques alone (1.2–2.3%). Anxiolytic medication was provided for 10% of patients at some stage during the treatment journey and 5% required a break from the mask at SIM, with frequency decreasing throughout the treatment course.

Conclusions

In this regional cancer setting, situational anxiety was common, but generally decreased throughout treatment. Some patients experience persistent or increasing anxiety, with up to 10% of patients receiving specific anxiety management interventions.

Abstract Image

癌症头部和颈部的情境焦虑:区域癌症环境中的发病率、模式和临床管理干预。
引言:研究表明,头颈癌放射治疗所需的固定面罩会引发强烈的焦虑。然而,人们对这种焦虑的发生率、它是否会在一个疗程中发生变化以及在临床实践中是如何管理的知之甚少。本研究旨在描述在澳大利亚新南威尔士州癌症主要地区接受头颈部癌症RT治疗的患者中情境焦虑的发生率和模式,以及在当前临床实践中焦虑管理干预措施的使用情况。方法:在制定治疗计划(SIM)前、前三次治疗(Tx 1,Tx 2和Tx 3) 和治疗20(Tx 20) 。会议记录了一般支持性干预措施(音乐和支持人员)和特定焦虑干预措施(摘下口罩、放松技巧和抗焦虑药物)的使用情况。从病历中提取社会病理和临床信息。结果:共招募111名患者。三分之一的人在前三个时间点中的任何一个时间点都有临床显著的焦虑(33.3-40%),四分之一在Tx 3(26.4%)和Tx 20人(23.4%)。在样本中,55.4%的人有可用数据可分为四个模式组之一:“无焦虑”(46.4%)减少焦虑(35.7%)焦虑加剧(7.1%);和“稳定的高度焦虑”(10.7%)。大多数参与者在SIM有社会支持(53.5%),在治疗期间听音乐(86.7-92.9%)。很少有参与者单独接受放松技术(1.2-2.3%)。在治疗过程中的某个阶段,10%的患者提供了焦虑药物,5%的患者需要在SIM摘下口罩,在整个治疗过程中频率降低。结论:在这种区域性癌症环境中,情境焦虑是常见的,但在整个治疗过程中普遍减少。一些患者经历了持续或不断增加的焦虑,高达10%的患者接受了特定的焦虑管理干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信