Accuracy and User Acceptability of 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring by a Prototype Cuffless Multi-Sensor Device Compared to a Conventional Oscillometric Device.

IF 1.8 4区 医学
Blood Pressure Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-26 DOI:10.1080/08037051.2023.2274595
Sondre Heimark, Christine Hove, Alexey Stepanov, Elin Sundby Boysen, Øyvind Gløersen, Kasper Gade Bøtke-Rasmussen, Hans Jacob Gravdal, Kesi Narayanapillai, Fadl Elmula M Fadl Elmula, Trine M Seeberg, Anne Cecilie K Larstorp, Bård Waldum-Grevbo
{"title":"Accuracy and User Acceptability of 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring by a Prototype Cuffless Multi-Sensor Device Compared to a Conventional Oscillometric Device.","authors":"Sondre Heimark,&nbsp;Christine Hove,&nbsp;Alexey Stepanov,&nbsp;Elin Sundby Boysen,&nbsp;Øyvind Gløersen,&nbsp;Kasper Gade Bøtke-Rasmussen,&nbsp;Hans Jacob Gravdal,&nbsp;Kesi Narayanapillai,&nbsp;Fadl Elmula M Fadl Elmula,&nbsp;Trine M Seeberg,&nbsp;Anne Cecilie K Larstorp,&nbsp;Bård Waldum-Grevbo","doi":"10.1080/08037051.2023.2274595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24ABPM) is state of the art in out-of-office blood pressure (BP) monitoring. Due to discomfort and technical limitations related to cuff-based 24ABPM devices, methods for non-invasive and continuous estimation of BP without the need for a cuff have gained interest. The main aims of the present study were to compare accuracy of a pulse arrival time (PAT) based BP-model and user acceptability of a prototype cuffless multi-sensor device (cuffless device), developed by Aidee Health AS, with a conventional cuff-based oscillometric device (ReferenceBP) during 24ABPM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-five normotensive and hypertensive adults underwent simultaneous 24ABPM with the cuffless device on the chest and a conventional cuff-based oscillometric device on the non-dominant arm. PAT was calculated using the electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors incorporated in the chest-worn device. The cuffless device recorded continuously, while ReferenceBP measurements were taken every 20 minutes during daytime and every 30 minutes during nighttime. Two-minute PAT-based BP predictions corresponding to the ReferenceBP measurements were compared with ReferenceBP measurements using paired t-tests, bias, and limits of agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean (SD) of ReferenceBP compared to PAT-based daytime and nighttime systolic BP (SBP) were 129.7 (13.8) mmHg versus 133.6 (20.9) mmHg and 113.1 (16.5) mmHg versus 131.9 (23.4) mmHg. Ninety-five % limits of agreements were [-26.7, 34.6 mmHg] and [-20.9, 58.4 mmHg] for daytime and nighttime SBP respectively. The cuffless device was reported to be significantly more comfortable and less disturbing than the ReferenceBP device during 24ABPM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the present study, we demonstrated that a general PAT-based BP model had unsatisfactory agreement with ambulatory BP during 24ABPM, especially during nighttime. If sufficient accuracy can be achieved, cuffless BP devices have promising potential for clinical assessment of BP due to the opportunities provided by continuous BP measurements during real-life conditions and high user acceptability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9000,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2023.2274595","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24ABPM) is state of the art in out-of-office blood pressure (BP) monitoring. Due to discomfort and technical limitations related to cuff-based 24ABPM devices, methods for non-invasive and continuous estimation of BP without the need for a cuff have gained interest. The main aims of the present study were to compare accuracy of a pulse arrival time (PAT) based BP-model and user acceptability of a prototype cuffless multi-sensor device (cuffless device), developed by Aidee Health AS, with a conventional cuff-based oscillometric device (ReferenceBP) during 24ABPM.

Methods: Ninety-five normotensive and hypertensive adults underwent simultaneous 24ABPM with the cuffless device on the chest and a conventional cuff-based oscillometric device on the non-dominant arm. PAT was calculated using the electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors incorporated in the chest-worn device. The cuffless device recorded continuously, while ReferenceBP measurements were taken every 20 minutes during daytime and every 30 minutes during nighttime. Two-minute PAT-based BP predictions corresponding to the ReferenceBP measurements were compared with ReferenceBP measurements using paired t-tests, bias, and limits of agreement.

Results: Mean (SD) of ReferenceBP compared to PAT-based daytime and nighttime systolic BP (SBP) were 129.7 (13.8) mmHg versus 133.6 (20.9) mmHg and 113.1 (16.5) mmHg versus 131.9 (23.4) mmHg. Ninety-five % limits of agreements were [-26.7, 34.6 mmHg] and [-20.9, 58.4 mmHg] for daytime and nighttime SBP respectively. The cuffless device was reported to be significantly more comfortable and less disturbing than the ReferenceBP device during 24ABPM.

Conclusions: In the present study, we demonstrated that a general PAT-based BP model had unsatisfactory agreement with ambulatory BP during 24ABPM, especially during nighttime. If sufficient accuracy can be achieved, cuffless BP devices have promising potential for clinical assessment of BP due to the opportunities provided by continuous BP measurements during real-life conditions and high user acceptability.

与传统示波仪相比,无套多传感器原型设备24小时动态血压监测的准确性和用户可接受性。
目的:24小时动态血压监测(24ABPM)是目前最先进的非办公室血压监测方法。由于与基于袖带的24ABPM装置相关的不适和技术限制,在不需要袖带的情况下无创和连续估计血压的方法已经引起了人们的兴趣。本研究的主要目的是比较基于脉冲到达时间(PAT)的BP模型的准确性和Aidee Health AS开发的原型无袖带多传感器设备(无袖带设备)的用户可接受性,方法:95名血压正常和高血压的成年人同时接受了24ABPM,在胸部使用无袖带装置,在非优势臂使用常规袖带示波装置。PAT是使用结合在胸部佩戴设备中的心电图(ECG)和光体积描记术(PPG)传感器计算的。无袖带设备连续记录,而ReferenceBP测量每20次 白天每30分钟 分钟。使用配对t检验、偏倚和一致性极限,将与ReferenceBP测量相对应的基于两分钟PAT的BP预测与ReferenceBB测量进行比较。结果:与基于PAT的日间和夜间收缩压(SBP)相比,参考血压的平均值(SD)分别为129.7(13.8)mmHg和133.6(20.9)mmHg,113.1(16.5)mmHg与131.9(23.4)mm汞柱。95%的协议限制为[-26.7,34.6 mmHg]和[-20.9,58.4 mmHg]。据报道,在24ABPM期间,无袖套装置比ReferenceBP装置明显更舒适,干扰更小。结论:在本研究中,我们证明了基于PAT的通用BP模型在24ABPM期间,尤其是在夜间,与动态BP的一致性不令人满意。如果能够实现足够的准确性,无套BP设备具有很好的临床评估BP的潜力,因为在现实生活条件下连续测量BP提供了机会,并且用户可接受性很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: For outstanding coverage of the latest advances in hypertension research, turn to Blood Pressure, a primary source for authoritative and timely information on all aspects of hypertension research and management. Features include: • Physiology and pathophysiology of blood pressure regulation • Primary and secondary hypertension • Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular complications of hypertension • Detection, treatment and follow-up of hypertension • Non pharmacological and pharmacological management • Large outcome trials in hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信