Neural network approaches and their reproducibility in the study of verbal working memory and Alzheimer’s disease

Christian Habeck , Yaakov Stern
{"title":"Neural network approaches and their reproducibility in the study of verbal working memory and Alzheimer’s disease","authors":"Christian Habeck ,&nbsp;Yaakov Stern","doi":"10.1016/j.cnr.2007.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>As clinical and cognitive neurosciences mature, the need for sophisticated neuroimaging analysis becomes more apparent. Multivariate analysis techniques have recently received increasing attention because they have attractive features that cannot be easily realized by the more commonly used univariate, voxel-wise, techniques. Multivariate approaches evaluate correlation/covariance of activation across brain regions, rather than proceeding on a voxel-by-voxel basis. Thus, their results can be more easily interpreted as a signature of neural networks. Univariate approaches, in contrast, cannot directly address </span>functional connectivity<span> in the brain. Apart from this conceptual difference, the covariance approach can also result in greater statistical power when compared with univariate techniques, which are forced to employ very stringent, and often overly conservative, corrections for voxel-wise multiple comparisons. Multivariate techniques also lend themselves much better to prospective application of results from the analysis of one dataset to entirely new datasets. We provide two examples that illustrate different uses of multivariate techniques in cognitive and clinical neuroscience. We hope this contribution helps facilitate wider dissemination of these techniques in the research community.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":87465,"journal":{"name":"Clinical neuroscience research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cnr.2007.05.004","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical neuroscience research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566277207000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

As clinical and cognitive neurosciences mature, the need for sophisticated neuroimaging analysis becomes more apparent. Multivariate analysis techniques have recently received increasing attention because they have attractive features that cannot be easily realized by the more commonly used univariate, voxel-wise, techniques. Multivariate approaches evaluate correlation/covariance of activation across brain regions, rather than proceeding on a voxel-by-voxel basis. Thus, their results can be more easily interpreted as a signature of neural networks. Univariate approaches, in contrast, cannot directly address functional connectivity in the brain. Apart from this conceptual difference, the covariance approach can also result in greater statistical power when compared with univariate techniques, which are forced to employ very stringent, and often overly conservative, corrections for voxel-wise multiple comparisons. Multivariate techniques also lend themselves much better to prospective application of results from the analysis of one dataset to entirely new datasets. We provide two examples that illustrate different uses of multivariate techniques in cognitive and clinical neuroscience. We hope this contribution helps facilitate wider dissemination of these techniques in the research community.

神经网络方法及其在言语工作记忆和阿尔茨海默病研究中的可重复性
随着临床和认知神经科学的成熟,对复杂的神经成像分析的需求变得更加明显。多变量分析技术最近受到越来越多的关注,因为它们具有更常用的单变量、体素技术无法轻易实现的有吸引力的特征。多变量方法评估大脑各区域激活的相关性/协方差,而不是在逐体素的基础上进行。因此,他们的结果可以更容易地解释为神经网络的特征。相比之下,单变量方法不能直接解决大脑中的功能连接问题。除了这种概念上的差异之外,与单变量技术相比,协方差方法还可以产生更大的统计能力,单变量技术被迫采用非常严格的、通常过于保守的、针对体素的多重比较的校正。多变量技术也使自己更适合于从一个数据集的分析结果到全新数据集的前瞻性应用。我们提供了两个例子来说明多元技术在认知和临床神经科学中的不同用途。我们希望这一贡献有助于促进这些技术在研究界的广泛传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信