Spontaneous organization in task-switching reflects self-reported polychronicity and media multitasking tendency

Q1 Psychology
Vivien Gaujoux , François Osiurak , Emanuelle Reynaud
{"title":"Spontaneous organization in task-switching reflects self-reported polychronicity and media multitasking tendency","authors":"Vivien Gaujoux ,&nbsp;François Osiurak ,&nbsp;Emanuelle Reynaud","doi":"10.1016/j.crbeha.2022.100085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Studies on media multitasking behavior and task-switching performance have yielded mixed results. The present preliminary study (<em>N</em> = 40) focused on task management, and not performance, by allowing participants to choose the switching frequency between tasks all along the experiment. This design revealed two different patterns of organization, with many participants choosing no variation at all and sticking to this organization throughout the entire experiment. We found no impact of organization type on performance. The participants who switched more often scored higher on polychronicity (i.e., preference for multitasking) and media multitasking scales. We did not find any relationship between executive functioning and task organization or media multitasking scores, but this result should be regarded with caution given the limited sample size. In broad terms, individuals tend to declare a media multitasking tendency in line with their spontaneous organization on multiple tasks, with more sequentially organized participants reporting lower media multitasking behavior. These results point to a seemingly global individual strategy to approach multiple tasks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72746,"journal":{"name":"Current research in behavioral sciences","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100085"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666518222000201/pdfft?md5=f54e0e90967b3601c46761fd08bf564b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666518222000201-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in behavioral sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666518222000201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies on media multitasking behavior and task-switching performance have yielded mixed results. The present preliminary study (N = 40) focused on task management, and not performance, by allowing participants to choose the switching frequency between tasks all along the experiment. This design revealed two different patterns of organization, with many participants choosing no variation at all and sticking to this organization throughout the entire experiment. We found no impact of organization type on performance. The participants who switched more often scored higher on polychronicity (i.e., preference for multitasking) and media multitasking scales. We did not find any relationship between executive functioning and task organization or media multitasking scores, but this result should be regarded with caution given the limited sample size. In broad terms, individuals tend to declare a media multitasking tendency in line with their spontaneous organization on multiple tasks, with more sequentially organized participants reporting lower media multitasking behavior. These results point to a seemingly global individual strategy to approach multiple tasks.

任务转换中的自发组织反映了自我报告的多时性和媒介多任务倾向
媒体多任务行为和任务切换表现的研究结果好坏参半。目前的初步研究(N = 40)侧重于任务管理,而不是表现,允许参与者在整个实验过程中选择任务之间的切换频率。这个设计揭示了两种不同的组织模式,许多参与者选择完全没有变化,并在整个实验中坚持这种组织。我们没有发现组织类型对绩效的影响。切换更频繁的参与者在多时性(即对多任务处理的偏好)和媒体多任务处理量表上得分更高。我们没有发现执行功能与任务组织或媒体多任务得分之间的任何关系,但考虑到有限的样本量,这个结果应该谨慎对待。从广义上讲,个体倾向于宣布媒体多任务处理倾向与他们对多任务的自发组织一致,顺序组织的参与者报告的媒体多任务处理行为更低。这些结果表明了一种看似全球性的个人策略来处理多重任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current research in behavioral sciences
Current research in behavioral sciences Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信