Composition and digestibility of untreated and chemically treated animal excreta for ruminants—A review

G. Flachowsky, A. Hennig
{"title":"Composition and digestibility of untreated and chemically treated animal excreta for ruminants—A review","authors":"G. Flachowsky,&nbsp;A. Hennig","doi":"10.1016/0269-7483(90)90041-P","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The paper reports on the crude nutrient content and the mineral profile, as well as the apparent digestibility by ruminants, of faeces of poultry, pigs and cattle, poultry litter and solid matter of poultry, pig and cattle slurries. The second part of the paper deals with chemical treatment of pig and cattle slurry solids with NaOH, KOH and urea.</p><p>Nutrient and mineral content as well as digestibility of animal excreta are greatly influenced by species, age and type of feeding, the bedding material used and the method of solid-liquid separation of slurries.</p><p>The digestibility of poultry excreta is higher than that of pig waste. Cattle faeces are unsuitable as feeds even after chemical treatment.</p><p><em>In sacco</em> degradability, apparent digestibility, energy content and intake of pig slurry solids were increased by treatment with urea, NaOH and KOH. Level of chemicals used and temperature influenced the effect of treatment. Wet pig-slurry solids may be preserved with urea.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100177,"journal":{"name":"Biological Wastes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0269-7483(90)90041-P","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Wastes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/026974839090041P","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

The paper reports on the crude nutrient content and the mineral profile, as well as the apparent digestibility by ruminants, of faeces of poultry, pigs and cattle, poultry litter and solid matter of poultry, pig and cattle slurries. The second part of the paper deals with chemical treatment of pig and cattle slurry solids with NaOH, KOH and urea.

Nutrient and mineral content as well as digestibility of animal excreta are greatly influenced by species, age and type of feeding, the bedding material used and the method of solid-liquid separation of slurries.

The digestibility of poultry excreta is higher than that of pig waste. Cattle faeces are unsuitable as feeds even after chemical treatment.

In sacco degradability, apparent digestibility, energy content and intake of pig slurry solids were increased by treatment with urea, NaOH and KOH. Level of chemicals used and temperature influenced the effect of treatment. Wet pig-slurry solids may be preserved with urea.

反刍动物未经处理和化学处理的排泄物组成及消化率研究进展
本文报道了禽、猪、牛粪便、禽粪和禽、猪、牛泥固体物质的粗营养成分含量、矿物质分布及反刍动物的表观消化率。第二部分研究了用氢氧化钠、氢氧化钾和尿素对猪、牛浆固体进行化学处理。动物排泄物的营养和矿物质含量以及消化率受饲养种类、年龄和种类、所用垫层材料和浆液固液分离方法的影响很大。家禽排泄物消化率高于猪粪消化率。牛粪即使经过化学处理也不适合作饲料。在蔗渣降解性方面,尿素、NaOH和KOH处理可提高猪浆液固体的表观消化率、能量含量和摄食量。化学药品的使用水平和温度影响处理效果。湿的猪浆固体可以用尿素保存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信