The persistence of gender stereotypes in the face of changing sex roles: Evidence contrary to the sociocultural model

Lloyd B. Lueptow, Lori Garovich, Margaret B. Lueptow
{"title":"The persistence of gender stereotypes in the face of changing sex roles: Evidence contrary to the sociocultural model","authors":"Lloyd B. Lueptow,&nbsp;Lori Garovich,&nbsp;Margaret B. Lueptow","doi":"10.1016/0162-3095(95)00072-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Prevailing explanations for gender differences rest upon the sociocultural model, which treats personality as a consequence of socialization for social roles. Though sex roles and attitudes toward them have changed dramatically in the United States over the past three decades, a review of 18 longitudinal studies of gender stereotypes and self-ratings shows stability in perceptions of sex-typed personality traits. Our study of 3600 students surveyed in six waves from 1974 to 1991 also shows stability and even a slight increase in sex typing. This accumulating evidence is inconsistent with the sociocultural explanation. It is more consistent with the currently emerging sociobiological research that holds gender differences reflect innate differences between the sexes resulting from their different reproductive strategies. We conclude that valid social psychological explanations for gendered personality traits cannot rest upon sociocultural models alone but must include interaction of this unchanging genetic underlay with changeable social structures and processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81211,"journal":{"name":"Ethology and sociobiology","volume":"16 6","pages":"Pages 509-530"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0162-3095(95)00072-0","citationCount":"110","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethology and sociobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0162309595000720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 110

Abstract

Prevailing explanations for gender differences rest upon the sociocultural model, which treats personality as a consequence of socialization for social roles. Though sex roles and attitudes toward them have changed dramatically in the United States over the past three decades, a review of 18 longitudinal studies of gender stereotypes and self-ratings shows stability in perceptions of sex-typed personality traits. Our study of 3600 students surveyed in six waves from 1974 to 1991 also shows stability and even a slight increase in sex typing. This accumulating evidence is inconsistent with the sociocultural explanation. It is more consistent with the currently emerging sociobiological research that holds gender differences reflect innate differences between the sexes resulting from their different reproductive strategies. We conclude that valid social psychological explanations for gendered personality traits cannot rest upon sociocultural models alone but must include interaction of this unchanging genetic underlay with changeable social structures and processes.

面对不断变化的性别角色,性别刻板印象依然存在:与社会文化模式相反的证据
对性别差异的普遍解释基于社会文化模型,该模型将人格视为社会角色社会化的结果。尽管在过去的三十年里,美国的性别角色和对性别角色的态度发生了巨大的变化,但对18项关于性别刻板印象和自我评价的纵向研究的回顾显示,人们对性别类型人格特征的看法是稳定的。从1974年到1991年,我们分六次对3600名学生进行了调查,结果也表明性别类型趋于稳定,甚至略有增加。这一积累的证据与社会文化解释不一致。这与目前新兴的社会生物学研究更加一致,认为性别差异反映了两性之间由于不同的生殖策略而产生的先天差异。我们的结论是,对性别人格特征的有效社会心理学解释不能仅仅依赖于社会文化模式,而必须包括这种不变的遗传基础与变化的社会结构和过程的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信