Walking fast-ranking high: A sociobiological perspective on pace

Abstract

Sexual selection theory says that because females are the limiting factor in reproduction, males have to compete for them. Females in turn choose among males. In humans, socioeconomic status is a much more important mate choice criterion of women than of men. Thus, striving for status and signaling status is more important for men. We chose walking to test this sex difference because upright posture and walking probably were under sexual selection pressure for a long time. The latter is illustrated by upright threat displaying, quite common in male primates; for example, men may walk stiff and erect and accelerate to vigorous striding, both to impress women and to threaten rivals (in which case they may also raise their arms). Moreover, gathering and hunting, the condition of all modern humans until about 15,000 years ago, implies a division of labor, with men playing the more mobile hunter part. In view of the outstanding importance of food for female reproduction, women probably highly valued men's hunting capabilities, among which are locomotory speed and perseverance. Long-standing quantitative data on walking speed also suggest a sex-specific association between pace and status. We hypothesized that habitual fast walking might be a means to acquire and/or to display status, and predicted a positive correlation between walking speed and socioeconomic status in men, not in women. We found that men walked faster, the higher their status, whereas the pace of women was independent of their status. This result held when proximate factors like age, body height, next destination, and number of dates were controlled for.