The functional analysis of human fertility decisions

Guy Beauchamp
{"title":"The functional analysis of human fertility decisions","authors":"Guy Beauchamp","doi":"10.1016/0162-3095(94)90026-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the theoretical structure of new home economics models, human fertility decisions are taken so as to maximize satisfaction provided to the parents by the presence and well-being of their children and by other competing commodities. Nevertheless, the concept of utility of children fails to specify why parents benefit from the presence and well-being of their progeny. In this study, fertility choices are analyzed from an evolutionary perspective. Parents are thus expected to adopt a lifetime fertility schedule `that maximizes fitness, defined here as the product of quantity with quality of offspring. Quality refers to the probability that reproduction occurs in the next generation, a variable that is thought to depend on the amount of resources allocated by the parents to the progeny. Using multiperiod dynamic models of fertility, it is shown that an increase in wealth and income reduces time to first conceptions and increases total conceptions. However, the relationship between offspring number and income is not always positive as changes in child quality also occur. Uncertainty about future economic status favors more conservative fertility schedules. Qualitative predictions of the models are generally supported by available evidence, although much work remains to be done to estimate the models quantitatively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81211,"journal":{"name":"Ethology and sociobiology","volume":"15 1","pages":"Pages 31-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0162-3095(94)90026-4","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethology and sociobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0162309594900264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

In the theoretical structure of new home economics models, human fertility decisions are taken so as to maximize satisfaction provided to the parents by the presence and well-being of their children and by other competing commodities. Nevertheless, the concept of utility of children fails to specify why parents benefit from the presence and well-being of their progeny. In this study, fertility choices are analyzed from an evolutionary perspective. Parents are thus expected to adopt a lifetime fertility schedule `that maximizes fitness, defined here as the product of quantity with quality of offspring. Quality refers to the probability that reproduction occurs in the next generation, a variable that is thought to depend on the amount of resources allocated by the parents to the progeny. Using multiperiod dynamic models of fertility, it is shown that an increase in wealth and income reduces time to first conceptions and increases total conceptions. However, the relationship between offspring number and income is not always positive as changes in child quality also occur. Uncertainty about future economic status favors more conservative fertility schedules. Qualitative predictions of the models are generally supported by available evidence, although much work remains to be done to estimate the models quantitatively.

人类生育决策的功能分析
在新家政学模型的理论结构中,人类生育决策是为了最大限度地满足父母对子女的存在和幸福以及其他竞争商品的满意度。然而,儿童效用的概念未能具体说明为什么父母从子女的存在和幸福中受益。本研究从进化的角度分析了生育选择。因此,父母被期望采用一种“终生生育计划”,以最大限度地提高适应性,这里将其定义为后代数量与质量的乘积。质量指的是下一代繁殖的可能性,这个变量被认为取决于父母分配给后代的资源数量。利用生育率的多时期动态模型表明,财富和收入的增加减少了第一次怀孕的时间,增加了总生育率。然而,子女数量和收入之间的关系并不总是正相关的,因为子女的素质也会发生变化。未来经济状况的不确定性倾向于保守的生育计划。这些模型的定性预测通常得到现有证据的支持,尽管在定量估计这些模型方面仍有许多工作要做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信