Providing the requested historical consultation: Hekala and Buell's rebuttal to Johnsons' reply

Tamsin Hekala, Paul D. Buell
{"title":"Providing the requested historical consultation: Hekala and Buell's rebuttal to Johnsons' reply","authors":"Tamsin Hekala,&nbsp;Paul D. Buell","doi":"10.1016/0162-3095(94)00008-U","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hekala and Buell provide a detailed example of the use of historical data to answer the original question posed by Johnson and Johnson concerning possible links between genetic kinsmen in support or conflict situations in Northern Europe during the Middle Ages. The authors affirm the viability of sociobiological principles when coupled with an appropriate use of historical data. In brief, the article confirms the findings of Daly and Wilson on homicide and cultural perceptions of kinship, refutes the final conclusions of Johnson and Johnson, and provides a clear, step-by-step instructional model of historical methodology for non-historians.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81211,"journal":{"name":"Ethology and sociobiology","volume":"16 1","pages":"Pages 71-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0162-3095(94)00008-U","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethology and sociobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016230959400008U","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Hekala and Buell provide a detailed example of the use of historical data to answer the original question posed by Johnson and Johnson concerning possible links between genetic kinsmen in support or conflict situations in Northern Europe during the Middle Ages. The authors affirm the viability of sociobiological principles when coupled with an appropriate use of historical data. In brief, the article confirms the findings of Daly and Wilson on homicide and cultural perceptions of kinship, refutes the final conclusions of Johnson and Johnson, and provides a clear, step-by-step instructional model of historical methodology for non-historians.

提供所要求的历史咨询:Hekala和Buell对johnson的答复的反驳
Hekala和Buell提供了一个详细的例子,使用历史数据来回答Johnson和Johnson提出的最初问题,即中世纪北欧支持或冲突局势中遗传亲属之间可能存在的联系。作者肯定了当适当使用历史数据时,社会生物学原理的可行性。简而言之,这篇文章证实了戴利和威尔逊关于杀人和亲属文化观念的发现,驳斥了约翰逊和约翰逊的最终结论,并为非历史学家提供了一个清晰的、循序渐进的历史方法论教学模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信