Virginia Matzek, David Lewis, Anthony O’Geen, Michael Lennox, Sean D. Hogan, Shane T. Feirer, Valerie Eviner, Kenneth W. Tate
{"title":"Increases in soil and woody biomass carbon stocks as a result of rangeland riparian restoration","authors":"Virginia Matzek, David Lewis, Anthony O’Geen, Michael Lennox, Sean D. Hogan, Shane T. Feirer, Valerie Eviner, Kenneth W. Tate","doi":"10.1186/s13021-020-00150-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Globally, vegetation in riparian zones is frequently the target of restoration efforts because of its importance in reducing the input of eroded sediment and agricultural nutrient runoff to surface waters. Here we examine the potential of riparian zone restoration to enhance carbon sequestration. We measured soil and woody biomass carbon stocks, as well as soil carbon properties, in a long-term chronosequence of 42 streambank revegetation projects in northern California rangelands, varying in restoration age from 1 to 45?years old.</p><p>Where revegetation was successful, we found that soil carbon measured to 50?cm depth increased at a rate of 0.87?Mg C ha<sup>?1</sup> year<sup>?1</sup> on the floodplain and 1.12?Mg C ha<sup>?1</sup> year<sup>?1</sup> on the upper bank landform. Restored sites also exhibited trends toward increased soil carbon permanence, including an increased C:N ratio and lower fulvic acid: humic acid ratio. Tree and shrub carbon in restored sites was modeled to achieve a 50-year maximum of 187.5?Mg C ha<sup>?1</sup> in the channel, 279.3?Mg?ha<sup>?1</sup> in the floodplain, and 238.66?Mg?ha<sup>?1</sup> on the upper bank. After 20?years of restoration, the value of this carbon at current per-ton C prices would amount to $US 15,000 per km of restored stream.</p><p>We conclude that revegetating rangeland streambanks for erosion control has a substantial additional benefit of mitigating global climate change, and should be considered in carbon accounting and any associated financial compensation mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":505,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Balance and Management","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13021-020-00150-7","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Balance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13021-020-00150-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
Globally, vegetation in riparian zones is frequently the target of restoration efforts because of its importance in reducing the input of eroded sediment and agricultural nutrient runoff to surface waters. Here we examine the potential of riparian zone restoration to enhance carbon sequestration. We measured soil and woody biomass carbon stocks, as well as soil carbon properties, in a long-term chronosequence of 42 streambank revegetation projects in northern California rangelands, varying in restoration age from 1 to 45?years old.
Where revegetation was successful, we found that soil carbon measured to 50?cm depth increased at a rate of 0.87?Mg C ha?1 year?1 on the floodplain and 1.12?Mg C ha?1 year?1 on the upper bank landform. Restored sites also exhibited trends toward increased soil carbon permanence, including an increased C:N ratio and lower fulvic acid: humic acid ratio. Tree and shrub carbon in restored sites was modeled to achieve a 50-year maximum of 187.5?Mg C ha?1 in the channel, 279.3?Mg?ha?1 in the floodplain, and 238.66?Mg?ha?1 on the upper bank. After 20?years of restoration, the value of this carbon at current per-ton C prices would amount to $US 15,000 per km of restored stream.
We conclude that revegetating rangeland streambanks for erosion control has a substantial additional benefit of mitigating global climate change, and should be considered in carbon accounting and any associated financial compensation mechanisms.
在全球范围内,河岸带的植被往往是恢复工作的目标,因为它在减少侵蚀沉积物和农业养分径流向地表水的输入方面具有重要意义。在这里,我们研究了河岸带恢复的潜力,以加强碳固存。我们测量了土壤和木材生物量碳储量,以及土壤碳特性,在北加州牧场的42个河岸植被恢复项目的长期时间序列中,恢复年龄从1到45?岁了。在植被恢复成功的地方,我们发现土壤碳含量达到50?Cm深度以0.87?Mg C ha?1年?洪泛区1分,1.12分?Mg C ha?1年?1 .上岸地貌。恢复样地土壤碳持久性也呈现出增加的趋势,包括碳氮比增加和腐殖酸与腐殖酸比降低。恢复地点的树木和灌木碳被模拟为达到50年最大值187.5?Mg C ha?海峡1号,279.3毫克哈?河漫滩面积为1平方公里,238.66平方公里。1在上岸。经过20吗?按目前每吨碳的价格计算,这些碳的价值将达到每公里修复河流1.5万美元。我们的结论是,恢复牧场河岸以控制侵蚀对减缓全球气候变化具有实质性的额外效益,应在碳核算和任何相关的财务补偿机制中予以考虑。
期刊介绍:
Carbon Balance and Management is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of research aimed at developing a comprehensive policy relevant to the understanding of the global carbon cycle.
The global carbon cycle involves important couplings between climate, atmospheric CO2 and the terrestrial and oceanic biospheres. The current transformation of the carbon cycle due to changes in climate and atmospheric composition is widely recognized as potentially dangerous for the biosphere and for the well-being of humankind, and therefore monitoring, understanding and predicting the evolution of the carbon cycle in the context of the whole biosphere (both terrestrial and marine) is a challenge to the scientific community.
This demands interdisciplinary research and new approaches for studying geographical and temporal distributions of carbon pools and fluxes, control and feedback mechanisms of the carbon-climate system, points of intervention and windows of opportunity for managing the carbon-climate-human system.
Carbon Balance and Management is a medium for researchers in the field to convey the results of their research across disciplinary boundaries. Through this dissemination of research, the journal aims to support the work of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and to provide governmental and non-governmental organizations with instantaneous access to continually emerging knowledge, including paradigm shifts and consensual views.