Rarefaction and extrapolation with beta diversity under a framework of Hill numbers: The iNEXT.beta3D standardization

IF 7.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Anne Chao, Simon Thorn, Chun-Huo Chiu, Faye Moyes, Kai-Hsiang Hu, Robin L. Chazdon, Jessie Wu, Luiz Fernando S. Magnago, Maria Dornelas, David Zelený, Robert K. Colwell, Anne E. Magurran
{"title":"Rarefaction and extrapolation with beta diversity under a framework of Hill numbers: The iNEXT.beta3D standardization","authors":"Anne Chao,&nbsp;Simon Thorn,&nbsp;Chun-Huo Chiu,&nbsp;Faye Moyes,&nbsp;Kai-Hsiang Hu,&nbsp;Robin L. Chazdon,&nbsp;Jessie Wu,&nbsp;Luiz Fernando S. Magnago,&nbsp;Maria Dornelas,&nbsp;David Zelený,&nbsp;Robert K. Colwell,&nbsp;Anne E. Magurran","doi":"10.1002/ecm.1588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Based on sampling data, we propose a rigorous standardization method to measure and compare beta diversity across datasets. Here beta diversity, which quantifies the extent of among-assemblage differentiation, relies on Whittaker's original multiplicative decomposition scheme, but we use Hill numbers for any diversity order <i>q ≥</i> 0. Richness-based beta diversity (<i>q</i> = 0) quantifies the extent of species identity shift, whereas abundance-based (<i>q</i> &gt; 0) beta diversity also quantifies the extent of difference among assemblages in species abundance. We adopt and define the assumptions of a statistical sampling model as the foundation for our approach, treating sampling data as a representative sample taken from an assemblage. The approach makes a clear distinction between the theoretical assemblage level (unknown properties/parameters of the assemblage) and the sampling data level (empirical/observed statistics computed from data). At the assemblage level, beta diversity for <i>N</i> assemblages reflects the interacting effect of the species abundance distribution and spatial/temporal aggregation of individuals in the assemblage. Under independent sampling, observed beta (= gamma/alpha) diversity depends not only on among-assemblage differentiation but also on sampling effort/completeness, which in turn induces dependence of beta on alpha and gamma diversity. How to remove the dependence of richness-based beta diversity on its gamma component (species pool) has been intensely debated. Our approach is to standardize gamma and alpha based on sample coverage (an objective measure of sample completeness). For a single assemblage, the iNEXT method was developed, through interpolation (rarefaction) and extrapolation with Hill numbers, to standardize samples by sampling effort/completeness. Here we adapt the iNEXT standardization to alpha and gamma diversity, that is, alpha and gamma diversity are both assessed at the same level of sample coverage, to formulate standardized, coverage-based beta diversity. This extension of iNEXT to beta diversity required the development of novel concepts and theories, including a formal proof and simulation-based demonstration that the resulting standardized beta diversity removes the dependence of beta diversity on both gamma and alpha values, and thus reflects the pure among-assemblage differentiation. The proposed standardization is illustrated with spatial, temporal, and spatiotemporal datasets, while the freeware iNEXT.beta3D facilitates all computations and graphics.</p>","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"93 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.1588","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Based on sampling data, we propose a rigorous standardization method to measure and compare beta diversity across datasets. Here beta diversity, which quantifies the extent of among-assemblage differentiation, relies on Whittaker's original multiplicative decomposition scheme, but we use Hill numbers for any diversity order q ≥ 0. Richness-based beta diversity (q = 0) quantifies the extent of species identity shift, whereas abundance-based (q > 0) beta diversity also quantifies the extent of difference among assemblages in species abundance. We adopt and define the assumptions of a statistical sampling model as the foundation for our approach, treating sampling data as a representative sample taken from an assemblage. The approach makes a clear distinction between the theoretical assemblage level (unknown properties/parameters of the assemblage) and the sampling data level (empirical/observed statistics computed from data). At the assemblage level, beta diversity for N assemblages reflects the interacting effect of the species abundance distribution and spatial/temporal aggregation of individuals in the assemblage. Under independent sampling, observed beta (= gamma/alpha) diversity depends not only on among-assemblage differentiation but also on sampling effort/completeness, which in turn induces dependence of beta on alpha and gamma diversity. How to remove the dependence of richness-based beta diversity on its gamma component (species pool) has been intensely debated. Our approach is to standardize gamma and alpha based on sample coverage (an objective measure of sample completeness). For a single assemblage, the iNEXT method was developed, through interpolation (rarefaction) and extrapolation with Hill numbers, to standardize samples by sampling effort/completeness. Here we adapt the iNEXT standardization to alpha and gamma diversity, that is, alpha and gamma diversity are both assessed at the same level of sample coverage, to formulate standardized, coverage-based beta diversity. This extension of iNEXT to beta diversity required the development of novel concepts and theories, including a formal proof and simulation-based demonstration that the resulting standardized beta diversity removes the dependence of beta diversity on both gamma and alpha values, and thus reflects the pure among-assemblage differentiation. The proposed standardization is illustrated with spatial, temporal, and spatiotemporal datasets, while the freeware iNEXT.beta3D facilitates all computations and graphics.

Abstract Image

希尔数框架下beta多样性的稀疏和外推:iNEXT。beta3D标准化
基于采样数据,我们提出了一种严格的标准化方法来测量和比较数据集之间的beta多样性。这里,量化组合间分化程度的beta多样性依赖于Whittaker的原始乘法分解方案,但对于任何多样性阶q≥0,我们使用Hill数。基于丰富度的beta多样性(q = 0)量化了物种身份转移的程度,而基于丰度的beta多样性(q > 0)也量化了物种丰度组合之间的差异程度。我们采用并定义统计抽样模型的假设作为我们方法的基础,将抽样数据视为从组合中提取的代表性样本。该方法明确区分了理论组合水平(组合的未知属性/参数)和抽样数据水平(从数据中计算的经验/观察统计数据)。在组合水平上,N个组合的beta多样性反映了物种丰度分布与组合中个体时空聚集的交互作用。在独立采样下,观察到的beta (= gamma/alpha)多样性不仅取决于组合间的分化,还取决于采样努力/完整性,这反过来又导致了beta对alpha和gamma多样性的依赖。如何消除基于丰富度的β多样性对其γ成分(物种库)的依赖一直是争论的焦点。我们的方法是基于样本覆盖率(样本完整性的客观度量)来标准化gamma和alpha。对于单个组合,通过希尔数的插值(稀疏)和外推,开发了iNEXT方法,通过采样努力/完整性来标准化样本。在这里,我们将iNEXT的标准化应用于alpha和gamma多样性,即在相同的样本覆盖水平上评估alpha和gamma多样性,以制定标准化的、基于覆盖率的beta多样性。将iNEXT扩展到beta多样性需要开发新的概念和理论,包括正式的证明和基于模拟的演示,由此产生的标准化beta多样性消除了beta多样性对gamma和alpha值的依赖,从而反映了纯粹的组合间差异。提出的标准化是用空间、时间和时空数据集来说明的,而免费软件iNEXT。beta3D简化了所有的计算和图形。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Monographs
Ecological Monographs 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology. Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message. Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology. Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions. In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信