Subhasis Giri, A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi, Sean Woznicki, Zhen Zhang
下载PDF
{"title":"Analysis of best management practice effectiveness and spatiotemporal variability based on different targeting strategies","authors":"Subhasis Giri, A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi, Sean Woznicki, Zhen Zhang","doi":"10.1002/hyp.9577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, ten best management practices (BMP) were implemented on agricultural areas in the Saginaw River Watershed using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool model based on four targeting methods (Load per Subbasin Area Index (LPSAI), Load per Unit Area Index (LPUAI), Concentration Impact Index (CII), and Load Impact Index (LII)). The effective BMPs both for targeting and non-targeting pollutants were contour farming (CF) (except total nitrogen reduction during total phosphorus targeting scenario), residue management 1000 kg/ha and 2000 kg/ha, strip cropping, recharge structures, terracing, and native grass (NG). In contrast, conservation tillage and no tillage did not reduce significant amount of pollutants for any combination of targeting methods and priority areas. In regard to spatial correlation between targeting methods, a strong relationship was found between the LPSAI and LPUAI methods both for the sediment and total nitrogen targeting scenarios. In addition, a similar result was found between the CII and LPSAI targeting methods. Regarding the spatiotemporal variability of BMP implementation plan, distinct change in priority area was observed in the case of NG implementation by the end of the second year; however, this impact was minimal for CF due to less pollutant reduction efficiency compared to NG. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"28 3","pages":"431-445"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/hyp.9577","citationCount":"61","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.9577","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61
引用
批量引用
Abstract
In this study, ten best management practices (BMP) were implemented on agricultural areas in the Saginaw River Watershed using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool model based on four targeting methods (Load per Subbasin Area Index (LPSAI), Load per Unit Area Index (LPUAI), Concentration Impact Index (CII), and Load Impact Index (LII)). The effective BMPs both for targeting and non-targeting pollutants were contour farming (CF) (except total nitrogen reduction during total phosphorus targeting scenario), residue management 1000 kg/ha and 2000 kg/ha, strip cropping, recharge structures, terracing, and native grass (NG). In contrast, conservation tillage and no tillage did not reduce significant amount of pollutants for any combination of targeting methods and priority areas. In regard to spatial correlation between targeting methods, a strong relationship was found between the LPSAI and LPUAI methods both for the sediment and total nitrogen targeting scenarios. In addition, a similar result was found between the CII and LPSAI targeting methods. Regarding the spatiotemporal variability of BMP implementation plan, distinct change in priority area was observed in the case of NG implementation by the end of the second year; however, this impact was minimal for CF due to less pollutant reduction efficiency compared to NG. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
基于不同目标策略的最佳管理实践有效性及时空变异性分析
在本研究中,采用基于四种目标方法(每子流域面积负荷指数(LPSAI)、每单位面积负荷指数(LPUAI)、浓度影响指数(CII)和负荷影响指数(LII)的水土评估工具模型,在萨吉诺河流域的农业区实施了10项最佳管理实践(BMP)。目标和非目标污染物的有效BMPs分别是等高线耕作(除全磷目标情景下的全氮减少外)、秸秆管理(1000 kg/ha和2000 kg/ha)、带状种植、补给结构、梯田和原生草(NG)。相比之下,保护性耕作和免耕对任何目标方法和优先区域的组合都没有显著减少污染物的数量。在定位方法的空间相关性方面,LPSAI和LPUAI方法在沉积物和总氮的定位情景中都有很强的相关性。此外,在CII和LPSAI靶向方法之间发现了相似的结果。在BMP实施计划的时空变异性方面,到第二年末,在NG实施的情况下,优先区域发生明显变化;然而,由于与天然气相比,CF的污染减排效率较低,因此这种影响很小。版权所有©2012 John Wiley &儿子,有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。