A multi-targeted treatment approach to cancer cachexia: Auckland's Cancer Cachexia evaluating Resistance Training (ACCeRT) trial

Elaine S. Rogers, Rita Sasidharan, Graeme M. Sequeira, Matthew R. Wood, Stephen P. Bird, Justin W.L. Keogh, Bruce Arroll, Joanna Stewart, Roderick D. MacLeod
{"title":"A multi-targeted treatment approach to cancer cachexia: Auckland's Cancer Cachexia evaluating Resistance Training (ACCeRT) trial","authors":"Elaine S. Rogers,&nbsp;Rita Sasidharan,&nbsp;Graeme M. Sequeira,&nbsp;Matthew R. Wood,&nbsp;Stephen P. Bird,&nbsp;Justin W.L. Keogh,&nbsp;Bruce Arroll,&nbsp;Joanna Stewart,&nbsp;Roderick D. MacLeod","doi":"10.1002/rco2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cancer cachexia is a condition often seen at diagnosis, throughout anti-cancer treatments and in end-stage non-small-cell lung cancer patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\n \n <p>Participants with late-stage non-small-cell lung cancer and cachexia (defined as ≥5% weight loss within 12 months) were randomly assigned 1:2 to 2.09 g of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and 300 mg of cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib orally once daily vs. same dosing of EPA, celecoxib, plus two sessions per week of progressive resistance training and 20 g of oral essential amino acids high in leucine in a split dose over 3 days, after each session. Primary endpoint was the acceptability of the earlier multi-targeted approach. Main secondary endpoints included change in body weight and fat-free mass, by bioelectric impedance analysis and total quadriceps muscle volume by magnetic resonance imaging over 20 weeks. Sixty-nine patients were screened resulting in 20 patients being enrolled. Acceptability scored high, with 4.5/5 (Arm A) and 5/5 (Arm B) for EPA and 5/5 for celecoxib within both arms and 4.8/5 for progressive resistance training sessions and 4.5/5 for essential amino acids within Arm B, all at Week 20. Results showed a net gain in bioelectric impedance analysis fat-free mass of +1.3 kg, n = 2 (Arm A), compared with +0.7 kg, n = 7 (Arm B) at Week 12, and —1.5 kg, n = 2 (Arm A), compared with —1.7 kg, n = 4 (Arm B) at Week 20. Trends in efficacy in terms of improvement and/or stability in cachexia markers were seen within magnetic resonance imaging muscle volume, albumin, and C-reactive protein levels within both arms. There were no exercise-related adverse events, with one possible related adverse event of asymptomatic atrial fibrillation in one participant within Arm A.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Non-small-cell lung cancer cachectic patients are willing to be enrolled onto a multi-targeted treatment regimen and may benefit from cachexia symptom management even during the late/refractory stage.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73544,"journal":{"name":"JCSM rapid communications","volume":"3 1","pages":"11-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/rco2.10","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCSM rapid communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rco2.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

Cancer cachexia is a condition often seen at diagnosis, throughout anti-cancer treatments and in end-stage non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Methods and results

Participants with late-stage non-small-cell lung cancer and cachexia (defined as ≥5% weight loss within 12 months) were randomly assigned 1:2 to 2.09 g of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and 300 mg of cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib orally once daily vs. same dosing of EPA, celecoxib, plus two sessions per week of progressive resistance training and 20 g of oral essential amino acids high in leucine in a split dose over 3 days, after each session. Primary endpoint was the acceptability of the earlier multi-targeted approach. Main secondary endpoints included change in body weight and fat-free mass, by bioelectric impedance analysis and total quadriceps muscle volume by magnetic resonance imaging over 20 weeks. Sixty-nine patients were screened resulting in 20 patients being enrolled. Acceptability scored high, with 4.5/5 (Arm A) and 5/5 (Arm B) for EPA and 5/5 for celecoxib within both arms and 4.8/5 for progressive resistance training sessions and 4.5/5 for essential amino acids within Arm B, all at Week 20. Results showed a net gain in bioelectric impedance analysis fat-free mass of +1.3 kg, n = 2 (Arm A), compared with +0.7 kg, n = 7 (Arm B) at Week 12, and —1.5 kg, n = 2 (Arm A), compared with —1.7 kg, n = 4 (Arm B) at Week 20. Trends in efficacy in terms of improvement and/or stability in cachexia markers were seen within magnetic resonance imaging muscle volume, albumin, and C-reactive protein levels within both arms. There were no exercise-related adverse events, with one possible related adverse event of asymptomatic atrial fibrillation in one participant within Arm A.

Conclusions

Non-small-cell lung cancer cachectic patients are willing to be enrolled onto a multi-targeted treatment regimen and may benefit from cachexia symptom management even during the late/refractory stage.

Abstract Image

癌症恶病质的多靶点治疗方法:奥克兰癌症恶病质评估抵抗训练(ACCeRT)试验
癌症恶病质是一种常见于诊断、抗癌治疗和终末期非小细胞肺癌患者的疾病。方法和结果晚期非小细胞肺癌和恶恶质(定义为12个月内体重减轻≥5%)的参与者随机分配为1:2至2.09 g二十碳五烯酸(EPA)和300 mg环氧合酶-2抑制剂塞来昔布,每日口服一次,与相同剂量的EPA,塞来昔布加每周两次的渐进式阻力训练和20 g口服高赖氨酸必需氨基酸,分次服用3天。每次会议结束后。主要终点是早期多靶点治疗方法的可接受性。主要次要终点包括体重和无脂质量的变化,通过生物电阻抗分析和磁共振成像的总股四头肌体积在20周内。69名患者被筛选,20名患者入选。在第20周,EPA的可接受性得分很高,在两个组中,塞来昔布的可接受性分别为4.5/5 (A组)和5/5 (B组),渐进阻力训练的可接受性为4.8/5,B组中必需氨基酸的可接受性为4.5/5。结果显示,在生物电阻抗分析中,净增加的无脂质量为+1.3 kg, n = 2 (a组),而在第12周时为+0.7 kg, n = 7 (B组),在第20周时为-1.5 kg, n = 2 (a组),而在第20周时为-1.7 kg, n = 4 (B组)。在磁共振成像肌肉体积、白蛋白和c反应蛋白水平中,可以看到恶病质标志物改善和/或稳定性方面的疗效趋势。没有运动相关的不良事件,在a组中有一名参与者可能出现无症状房颤的不良事件。结论非小细胞肺癌恶病质患者愿意参加多靶向治疗方案,即使在晚期/难治期也可能从恶病质症状管理中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信