J. F. Djagba, J. Rodenburg, S. Zwart, C. J. Houndagba, P. Kiepe
{"title":"FAILURE AND SUCCESS FACTORS OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENTS: A CASE STUDY FROM THE OUÉMÉ AND ZOU VALLEYS IN BENIN","authors":"J. F. Djagba, J. Rodenburg, S. Zwart, C. J. Houndagba, P. Kiepe","doi":"10.1002/ird.1794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the period 1960–1980, Chinese and Taiwanese cooperations developed irrigated rice schemes throughout West Africa with variable success. In Benin for instance, schemes in Zonmon and Bamè (Ouémé Valley) were abandoned upon withdrawal of the project developers and have been sub‐optimally used ever since, while the neighbouring scheme of Koussin‐Lélé (Zou Valley) is still functional (double rice cropping) and well operated and maintained by the farmers. The factors for success and failure were investigated by comparing the two abandoned schemes with the successful one, using field observations and stakeholder surveys. We observed that (i) operation and maintenance costs associated with irrigation were presumably lower in the successful scheme––where irrigation was driven by gravity––compared to the failed ones––where part of the schemes were designed for motor‐pump driven irrigation. Moreover, contrary to the situation in the unsuccessful schemes, farmers in the successful scheme of Koussin‐Lélé benefit from (ii) external technical support, (iii) a favourable land tenure policy, entailing seasonal redistribution of plots favouring active and motivated producers, (iv) reliable access to credit, and (v) an effective farmer organization. These observations underscore the importance of addressing the longer‐term technical and financial needs of the beneficiaries for the successful development of irrigation schemes advancing smallholder farmers in sub‐Saharan Africa. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":92799,"journal":{"name":"Irrigation and drainage (International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage)","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ird.1794","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irrigation and drainage (International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.1794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38
灌溉系统发展的成败因素:以贝宁ouÉmÉ和邹河流域为例
在1960年至1980年期间,中国大陆和台湾合作在整个西非开发了灌溉水稻计划,取得了不同程度的成功。例如,在贝宁,Zonmon和Bamè (ousamoise Valley)的计划在项目开发商退出后被放弃,此后一直没有得到最佳利用,而邻近的Koussin - lsamoise (Zou Valley)计划仍在发挥作用(双稻种植),并由农民很好地操作和维护。通过实地观察和利益相关者调查,将两个放弃的方案与成功的方案进行比较,探讨了成功和失败的因素。我们观察到(i)与灌溉相关的操作和维护成本在成功的方案中(灌溉由重力驱动)与失败的方案(部分方案设计为电机泵驱动灌溉)相比可能更低。此外,与不成功的计划的情况相反,Koussin - lsamuise计划的农民受益于(ii)外部技术支持,(iii)有利的土地使用权政策,包括有利于积极和有动力的生产者的季节性重新分配地块,(iv)可靠的信贷渠道,以及(v)有效的农民组织。这些观察结果强调了解决受益者的长期技术和财政需求的重要性,以成功制定促进撒哈拉以南非洲小农发展的灌溉计划。版权所有©2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。