The idiosyncratic construction of stress: examples from medical work settings

B. Kirkcaldy, J. Athanasou, R. Trimpop
{"title":"The idiosyncratic construction of stress: examples from medical work settings","authors":"B. Kirkcaldy, J. Athanasou, R. Trimpop","doi":"10.1002/1099-1700(200010)16:5<315::AID-SMI867>3.0.CO;2-T","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is concerned with the subjective understanding of the work context and how it becomes stressful for an individual. It seeks to establish the individual dimensions of each person's situation in terms of the factors that are perceived to be stressful and also the ideas that underlie the meaning of stress for each person. Five case studies from medical work settings are used in this idiographic analysis of work stress. The situational elements relevant to each person were identified for a psychiatrist, theatre nurse, paediatrician, neurologist and optometry assistant. Repertory grid analysis was then used to extract the underlying constructs that gave meaning to stress for each person. Results indicated completely idiosyncratic perceptions of the meaning of stress and diverse situational determinants. It is argued that current approaches to theorising about stress in terms of general elements and common perceptions are challenged by these findings. Five separate cluster analyses of constructs and situations emphasised the vastly different situations or circumstances for each individual. In contrast to the findings of nomothetic research, a theoretical perspective evolving from the personal construction of the situation may be the significant determinant of anxiety and stressful reactions for each person. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":82818,"journal":{"name":"Stress medicine","volume":"592 ","pages":"315-326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1099-1700(200010)16:5<315::AID-SMI867>3.0.CO;2-T","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1700(200010)16:5<315::AID-SMI867>3.0.CO;2-T","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the subjective understanding of the work context and how it becomes stressful for an individual. It seeks to establish the individual dimensions of each person's situation in terms of the factors that are perceived to be stressful and also the ideas that underlie the meaning of stress for each person. Five case studies from medical work settings are used in this idiographic analysis of work stress. The situational elements relevant to each person were identified for a psychiatrist, theatre nurse, paediatrician, neurologist and optometry assistant. Repertory grid analysis was then used to extract the underlying constructs that gave meaning to stress for each person. Results indicated completely idiosyncratic perceptions of the meaning of stress and diverse situational determinants. It is argued that current approaches to theorising about stress in terms of general elements and common perceptions are challenged by these findings. Five separate cluster analyses of constructs and situations emphasised the vastly different situations or circumstances for each individual. In contrast to the findings of nomothetic research, a theoretical perspective evolving from the personal construction of the situation may be the significant determinant of anxiety and stressful reactions for each person. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
压力的特殊结构:来自医疗工作环境的例子
本文关注的是对工作环境的主观理解,以及它如何成为一个人的压力。它试图根据被认为是压力的因素以及每个人的压力意义背后的想法,建立每个人情况的个人层面。从医疗工作设置的五个案例研究被用于工作压力的具体分析。与每个人相关的情境因素被确定为精神科医生、手术室护士、儿科医生、神经科医生和验光助理。然后使用储备网格分析来提取对每个人的压力有意义的潜在结构。结果表明,对压力和不同情境决定因素的意义完全不同的看法。有人认为,目前的方法理论化的压力方面的一般因素和共同的看法受到这些发现的挑战。构式和情境的五个独立聚类分析强调了每个个体的巨大不同的情境或环境。与本体研究的结果相反,从情境的个人建构演变而来的理论视角可能是每个人焦虑和压力反应的重要决定因素。版权所有©2000约翰威利父子有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信