N. Maharshak, D. Zeltser, M. Kassirer, R. Rotstein, I. Shapira, O. Rogowski, P. Halperin, P. Sorkin, S. Berliner
{"title":"Size distribution of leukocyte aggregates differentiate between stress‐ and infection/inflammation‐related leukocytosis","authors":"N. Maharshak, D. Zeltser, M. Kassirer, R. Rotstein, I. Shapira, O. Rogowski, P. Halperin, P. Sorkin, S. Berliner","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-1700(200003)16:2<125::AID-SMI846>3.0.CO;2-B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluated the state of leukocyte adhesiveness/aggregation in the peripheral blood of 33 patients with stress and 33 patients with infection/inflammation. Both groups had a similar white blood cell count (9542±3067 and 10,512±2758 cells per cmm, respectively). It was found that the percentage of aggregated leukocytes in the peripheral blood of patients with infection/inflammation was significantly higher than in the patients with stress (24.7±11 per cent versus 15.8±6 per cent; p<0.0001). When we analyzed the size distribution of the aggregated cells we also found a significant difference between the number of couplets (2.7±1.9 versus 1.6±0.9; p=0.006), triplets (0.6±1.3 versus 0.2±0.2; p=0.05), quadruplets (0.14±0.2 versus 0.03±0.07; p=0.005) or quintets (0.04±0.1 versus 0.003±0.002; p=0.05) between these two groups. Thus, by using a simple slide test to reveal the state of leukocyte adhesiveness/aggregation in the peripheral blood one could favor the diagnosis of infection/inflammation induced leukocytosis as opposed to a stress-related one. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":82818,"journal":{"name":"Stress medicine","volume":"146 3","pages":"125-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1700(200003)16:2<125::AID-SMI846>3.0.CO;2-B","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
白细胞聚集体的大小分布可区分应激相关和感染/炎症相关的白细胞增多
我们评估了33例应激患者和33例感染/炎症患者外周血白细胞粘附/聚集状态。两组白细胞计数相近(分别为9542±3067和10512±2758细胞/ cmm)。结果发现,感染/炎症患者外周血中聚集的白细胞百分比明显高于应激患者(24.7±11% vs 15.8±6%;p < 0.0001)。当我们分析聚集细胞的大小分布时,我们也发现对联体数(2.7±1.9 vs 1.6±0.9)之间存在显著差异;P =0.006),三胞胎(0.6±1.3比0.2±0.2;P =0.05),四胞胎(0.14±0.2比0.03±0.07;P =0.005)或五重奏组(0.04±0.1 vs 0.003±0.002;P =0.05)。因此,通过使用简单的载玻片测试来揭示白细胞在外周血中的粘附/聚集状态,可以倾向于诊断感染/炎症诱导的白细胞增多症,而不是与应激相关的白细胞增多症。版权所有©2000约翰威利父子有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。