T. L. Lindquist, C. Cooper
{"title":"Using lifestyle and coping to reduce job stress and improve health in ‘at risk’ office workers","authors":"T. L. Lindquist, C. Cooper","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-1700(199907)15:3<143::AID-SMI808>3.0.CO;2-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study assessed the effectiveness of an intervention programme which employed previously identified lifestyle and coping strategies to reduce the subjective experience and effects of work-related stress. Employees (104) working in a government tax office with identified stress-related symptoms were randomized to enter an intervention group (52) or a control group (52). Pre- and post-programme questionnaire assessments of work-related stress, coping strategies, physical health and lifestyle as well as physiological assessments (blood pressure and body mass index) were used to evaluate changes following an 8-week programme implementation phase. The programme comprised four weekly workshops on stress and lifestyle education as well as stress-coping skills training, followed by individual counselling sessions and a personalized action plan. Control group members were offered the same programme after post-programme assessment. There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups for stress and health indicators at post-programme. A 12-week post-intervention follow-up showed reductions in perceived workplace (p<0.01) and home/work (p=0.05) stress. The data suggest that relatively short interventions with individual follow-up can reduce perceptions of stress even where workplace stressors have not changed. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":82818,"journal":{"name":"Stress medicine","volume":"276 1","pages":"143-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1700(199907)15:3<143::AID-SMI808>3.0.CO;2-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48
利用生活方式和应对方式来减轻工作压力,改善“风险”上班族的健康状况
本研究评估了一项干预计划的有效性,该计划采用了先前确定的生活方式和应对策略,以减少主观体验和工作压力的影响。在政府税务办公室工作的104名有压力相关症状的员工被随机分为干预组(52人)和对照组(52人)。对工作压力、应对策略、身体健康和生活方式以及生理评估(血压和体重指数)进行方案前后问卷评估,以评估8周方案实施阶段后的变化。该方案包括每周四次关于压力和生活方式教育的讲习班以及应付压力技能培训,随后是个别咨询会议和个性化行动计划。对照组成员在方案后评估后给予相同的方案。干预组与对照组在计划后的压力和健康指标方面没有统计学上的显著差异。干预后12周的随访显示,工作场所压力(p<0.01)和家庭/工作压力(p=0.05)降低。数据表明,即使在工作压力源没有改变的情况下,相对较短的干预和个人随访也可以减少压力的感知。版权所有©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。