Caryn L. Carlson, Misung Shin, Jane E. Booth
{"title":"The case for DSM‐IV subtypes in ADHD","authors":"Caryn L. Carlson, Misung Shin, Jane E. Booth","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1098-2779(1999)5:3<199::AID-MRDD6>3.0.CO;2-#","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article selectively reviews research that has examined the three DSM-IV attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) subtypes. Data relevant to the validity of the subtyping system, including demographic, comorbidity, cognitive/attentional, and social correlates of the three subtypes are presented. The majority of relevant research has examined the ADHD/C and ADHD/IA subtypes, with less information available for the newly identified ADHD/HI subtype. Findings support the existence of the ADHD/IA subtype; children so diagnosed show impairment and patterns of dysfunction unique from those with the ADHD/C subtype. Further research on many aspects of ADHD/IA is needed to clarify whether it is best considered a separate disorder or an ADHD subtype, however, and to determine the most appropriate diagnostic criteria. Although the scant existing data also suggest that the ADHD/HI subtype is associated with impairment and a different pattern of deficits relative to the other two subtypes, further elucidation of its developmental course is needed to clearly determine its validity. MRDD Research Reviews 1999;5:199–206 © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.","PeriodicalId":74175,"journal":{"name":"Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews","volume":"92 7","pages":"199-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2779(1999)5:3<199::AID-MRDD6>3.0.CO;2-#","citationCount":"59","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2779(1999)5:3<199::AID-MRDD6>3.0.CO;2-#","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59
ADHD中DSM - IV亚型的案例
本文选择性地回顾了DSM-IV中三种注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)亚型的研究。数据相关的有效性的亚型系统,包括人口统计,合并症,认知/注意力,和社会相关的三个亚型提出。大多数相关研究已经检查了ADHD/C和ADHD/IA亚型,对于新发现的ADHD/HI亚型的信息较少。研究结果支持ADHD/IA亚型的存在;如此诊断的儿童表现出与ADHD/C亚型不同的损伤和功能障碍模式。然而,需要对ADHD/IA的许多方面进行进一步的研究,以澄清它是最好被视为一种单独的疾病还是ADHD亚型,并确定最合适的诊断标准。尽管现有的少量数据也表明ADHD/HI亚型与其他两种亚型的损害和不同的缺陷模式相关,但需要进一步阐明其发展过程以明确其有效性。MRDD Research Reviews 1999;5:19 99 - 206©1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。