Representing the Structure of a Debate

IF 1 2区文学 Q3 COMMUNICATION

Argumentation Pub Date : 2022-10-27 DOI:10.1007/s10503-022-09586-2

Maralee Harrell

引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this article I aim to use the 1948 Russell-Copleston debate to highlight some recent problems I have experienced teaching argument analysis in my philosophy courses. First, I will use argument diagramming to represent the arguments in the debate while reflecting on the use of this approach use to teach argument analysis skills. Then, I will discuss the tools and methods scholars have proposed to represent debates, rather than just individual arguments. Finally, I will argue that there is not, but needs to be, a good way to represent argumentative debates in a way that neither obscures the essential details of the exchange nor becomes too unwieldy to extract a sense of the overall debate.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

代表辩论的结构

在这篇文章中，我的目的是利用1948年Russell Copleston的辩论来强调我最近在哲学课程中教授论点分析时遇到的一些问题。首先，我将使用论点图表来表示辩论中的论点，同时反思使用这种方法来教授论点分析技能。然后，我将讨论学者们提出的代表辩论的工具和方法，而不仅仅是个人论点。最后，我认为，没有，但必须有一种好的方式来表达辩论，既不会模糊交流的基本细节，也不会变得太难理解整个辩论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Argumentation Multiple-

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Argumentation is an international and interdisciplinary journal. Its aim is to gather academic contributions from a wide range of scholarly backgrounds and approaches to reasoning, natural inference and persuasion: communication, rhetoric (classical and modern), linguistics, discourse analysis, pragmatics, psychology, philosophy, logic (formal and informal), critical thinking, history and law. Its scope includes a diversity of interests, varying from philosophical, theoretical and analytical to empirical and practical topics. Argumentation publishes papers, book reviews, a yearly bibliography, and announcements of conferences and seminars.To be considered for publication in the journal, a paper must satisfy all of these criteria:1. Report research that is within the journals’ scope: concentrating on argumentation 2. Pose a clear and relevant research question 3. Make a contribution to the literature that connects with the state of the art in the field of argumentation theory 4. Be sound in methodology and analysis 5. Provide appropriate evidence and argumentation for the conclusions 6. Be presented in a clear and intelligible fashion in standard English