IRG2018: A regional geoid model in Iran using Least Squares Collocation

IF 0.5 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Sabah Ramouz, Yosra Afrasteh, Mirko Reguzzoni, Abdolreza Safari, Abdoreza Saadat
{"title":"IRG2018: A regional geoid model in Iran using Least Squares Collocation","authors":"Sabah Ramouz,&nbsp;Yosra Afrasteh,&nbsp;Mirko Reguzzoni,&nbsp;Abdolreza Safari,&nbsp;Abdoreza Saadat","doi":"10.1007/s11200-018-0116-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this study is to determine an accurate geoid model for Iran based on the Least Squares Collocation method in the framework of the Remove — Compute — Restore technique. In areas suffering from a lack of homogeneous and accurate gravity anomaly data, as is the case of Iran, the choice of the most compatible global gravity model has a significant impact on the estimated form of the geoid. Different combined and satellite-only global gravity models were therefore analyzed for Iran, and EIGEN6C4 was selected as the best one. The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission height model was used for the residual terrain correction. The covariance modeling, a crucial step in the Least Squares Collocation method, was based on two strategies. In the first, the study area was divided into four sub-areas, and then an individual empirical covariance was computed and a covariance model fitted to each of them. In the second, an empirical covariance was computed using all terrestrial gravity data, and a unique covariance model was fitted to it. Despite some border effects, the former strategy showed slightly better performance according to the resulting statistics, and therefore it was preferred for the estimation of the geoid model called IRG2018. To remove the offset of IRG2018 with respect to GNSS/Leveling-derived geoid heights, two alternative approaches were tested: subtracting a fitting polynomial surface or directly using the GNSS/Leveling data as an input to the IRG2018 computation process. Evaluation of the results, based on an independent control set of approximately half of available GNSS/Leveling points, showed an advantage of the latter approach, with an estimated accuracy of about 20 cm in terms of RMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":22001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica","volume":"63 2","pages":"191 - 214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11200-018-0116-4","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11200-018-0116-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine an accurate geoid model for Iran based on the Least Squares Collocation method in the framework of the Remove — Compute — Restore technique. In areas suffering from a lack of homogeneous and accurate gravity anomaly data, as is the case of Iran, the choice of the most compatible global gravity model has a significant impact on the estimated form of the geoid. Different combined and satellite-only global gravity models were therefore analyzed for Iran, and EIGEN6C4 was selected as the best one. The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission height model was used for the residual terrain correction. The covariance modeling, a crucial step in the Least Squares Collocation method, was based on two strategies. In the first, the study area was divided into four sub-areas, and then an individual empirical covariance was computed and a covariance model fitted to each of them. In the second, an empirical covariance was computed using all terrestrial gravity data, and a unique covariance model was fitted to it. Despite some border effects, the former strategy showed slightly better performance according to the resulting statistics, and therefore it was preferred for the estimation of the geoid model called IRG2018. To remove the offset of IRG2018 with respect to GNSS/Leveling-derived geoid heights, two alternative approaches were tested: subtracting a fitting polynomial surface or directly using the GNSS/Leveling data as an input to the IRG2018 computation process. Evaluation of the results, based on an independent control set of approximately half of available GNSS/Leveling points, showed an advantage of the latter approach, with an estimated accuracy of about 20 cm in terms of RMS.

IRG2018:基于最小二乘配置的伊朗区域大地水准面模型
本研究的目的是在移除-计算-恢复技术的框架下,基于最小二乘配置方法确定伊朗精确的大地水准面模型。在缺乏均匀和精确重力异常数据的地区,如伊朗,选择最兼容的全球重力模型对大地水准面形状的估计有重大影响。因此,对伊朗不同的组合和卫星全球重力模型进行了分析,并选择了EIGEN6C4模型作为最佳模型。利用航天飞机雷达地形任务高度模型对剩余地形进行校正。协方差建模是最小二乘配置法的关键步骤,它基于两种策略。首先,将研究区域划分为4个子区域,计算单个经验协方差,并拟合每个子区域的协方差模型。其次,利用所有地面重力数据计算经验协方差,并拟合出唯一的协方差模型。尽管存在一些边界效应,但根据所得统计数据,前一种策略的性能略好,因此更适合用于估算称为IRG2018的大地水准面模型。为了消除IRG2018相对于GNSS/Leveling衍生的大地水准面高度的偏移,测试了两种替代方法:减去拟合多项式曲面或直接使用GNSS/Leveling数据作为IRG2018计算过程的输入。基于大约一半可用GNSS/水准点的独立控制集对结果进行评估,显示了后一种方法的优势,就RMS而言,估计精度约为20厘米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Studia geophysica et geodaetica is an international journal covering all aspects of geophysics, meteorology and climatology, and of geodesy. Published by the Institute of Geophysics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, it has a long tradition, being published quarterly since 1956. Studia publishes theoretical and methodological contributions, which are of interest for academia as well as industry. The journal offers fast publication of contributions in regular as well as topical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信