Electrified powertrains for wheel-driven non-road mobile machinery

Josef Markus Ratzinger, Simon Buchberger, Helmut Eichlseder
{"title":"Electrified powertrains for wheel-driven non-road mobile machinery","authors":"Josef Markus Ratzinger,&nbsp;Simon Buchberger,&nbsp;Helmut Eichlseder","doi":"10.1007/s41104-020-00072-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Already enacted carbon-dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) limiting legislations for passenger cars and heavy duty vehicles, drive motivations to consider electrification also in the sector of non-road mobile machinery. Up to now, only the emissions of the vehicles themselves have been restricted. However, to capture the overall situation, a more global assessment approach is necessary. The study described in this article applies a tank-to-wheel and an extended well-to-wheel approach based on simulations to compare three different powertrains: a battery electric drive, a parallel electric hybrid drive, and a series electric hybrid drive. The results show that electrification is not per se the better solution in terms of keeping CO<sub>2</sub> emissions at a minimum, as battery electric powertrains are accountable for the lowest as well as the highest possible CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of all powertrains compared. A battery electric machine is not economically competitive if its battery has to last a whole working day. Parallel hybrid systems do not achieve much of an advantage in terms of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. In this global assessment approach, the most promising propulsion system for wheel-driven-mobile-machinery appears to be the series hybrid system, which shows to offer up to 20% of CO<sub>2</sub> saving potential compared to the current machine.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100150,"journal":{"name":"Automotive and Engine Technology","volume":"6 1-2","pages":"1 - 13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s41104-020-00072-z","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automotive and Engine Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41104-020-00072-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Already enacted carbon-dioxide (CO2) limiting legislations for passenger cars and heavy duty vehicles, drive motivations to consider electrification also in the sector of non-road mobile machinery. Up to now, only the emissions of the vehicles themselves have been restricted. However, to capture the overall situation, a more global assessment approach is necessary. The study described in this article applies a tank-to-wheel and an extended well-to-wheel approach based on simulations to compare three different powertrains: a battery electric drive, a parallel electric hybrid drive, and a series electric hybrid drive. The results show that electrification is not per se the better solution in terms of keeping CO2 emissions at a minimum, as battery electric powertrains are accountable for the lowest as well as the highest possible CO2 emissions of all powertrains compared. A battery electric machine is not economically competitive if its battery has to last a whole working day. Parallel hybrid systems do not achieve much of an advantage in terms of CO2 emissions. In this global assessment approach, the most promising propulsion system for wheel-driven-mobile-machinery appears to be the series hybrid system, which shows to offer up to 20% of CO2 saving potential compared to the current machine.

轮式非道路移动机械的电气化动力系统
已经颁布了针对乘用车和重型车辆的二氧化碳(CO2)限制立法,推动了非道路移动机械行业考虑电气化的动机。到目前为止,只有汽车本身的排放受到了限制。然而,为了掌握总体情况,有必要采取更加全球性的评估方法。本文中描述的研究应用了一种基于模拟的坦克到车轮和一种扩展的井到车轮的方法来比较三种不同的动力系统:电池电动驱动、并联电动混合驱动和串联电动混合驱动。结果表明,就将二氧化碳排放量保持在最低水平而言,电气化本身并不是更好的解决方案,因为与之相比,电池电动动力系统的二氧化碳排放量是所有动力系统中最低和最高的。如果电池必须使用一整天,那么电池电机在经济上就没有竞争力。并联混合动力系统在二氧化碳排放方面没有取得多大优势。在这种全球评估方法中,轮式移动机械最有前途的推进系统似乎是串联混合动力系统,与现有机器相比,该系统可提供高达20%的二氧化碳减排潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信