The impact of coal trains on PM2.5 in the San Francisco Bay area

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Bart Ostro, Nicholas Spada, Heather Kuiper
{"title":"The impact of coal trains on PM2.5 in the San Francisco Bay area","authors":"Bart Ostro,&nbsp;Nicholas Spada,&nbsp;Heather Kuiper","doi":"10.1007/s11869-023-01333-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) is associated with adverse health effects, including mortality, even at low concentrations. Rail conveyance of coal, accounting for one-third of American rail freight tonnage, is a source of PM<sub>2.5</sub>. However, there are limited studies of its contribution to PM<sub>2.5</sub>, especially in urban settings where residents experience higher exposure and vulnerability to air pollution. We developed a novel artificial intelligence-driven monitoring system to quantify average and maximum PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations of full and empty (unloaded) coal trains compared to freight and passenger trains. The monitor was close to the train tracks in Richmond, California, a city with a racially diverse population of 115,000 and high rates of asthma and heart disease. We used multiple linear regression models controlling for diurnal patterns and meteorology. The results indicate coal trains add on average 8.32 µg/m<sup>3</sup> (95% CI = 6.37, 10.28; p &lt; 0.01) to ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub>, while sensitivity analysis produced midpoints ranging from 5 to 12 µg/m<sup>3</sup>. Coal trains contributed 2 to 3 µg/m<sup>3</sup> more of PM<sub>2.5</sub> than freight trains, and 7 µg/m<sup>3</sup> more under calm wind conditions, suggesting our study underestimates emissions and subsequent concentrations of coal train dust. Empty coal cars tended to add 2 µg/m<sup>3</sup>. Regarding peak concentrations of PM<sub>2.5</sub>, our models suggest an increase of 17.4 µg/m<sup>3</sup> (95% CI = 6.2, 28.5; p &lt; 0.01) from coal trains, about 3 µg/m<sup>3</sup> more than freight trains. Given rail shipment of coal occurs globally, including in populous areas, it is likely to have adverse effects on health and environmental justice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11869-023-01333-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-023-01333-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is associated with adverse health effects, including mortality, even at low concentrations. Rail conveyance of coal, accounting for one-third of American rail freight tonnage, is a source of PM2.5. However, there are limited studies of its contribution to PM2.5, especially in urban settings where residents experience higher exposure and vulnerability to air pollution. We developed a novel artificial intelligence-driven monitoring system to quantify average and maximum PM2.5 concentrations of full and empty (unloaded) coal trains compared to freight and passenger trains. The monitor was close to the train tracks in Richmond, California, a city with a racially diverse population of 115,000 and high rates of asthma and heart disease. We used multiple linear regression models controlling for diurnal patterns and meteorology. The results indicate coal trains add on average 8.32 µg/m3 (95% CI = 6.37, 10.28; p < 0.01) to ambient PM2.5, while sensitivity analysis produced midpoints ranging from 5 to 12 µg/m3. Coal trains contributed 2 to 3 µg/m3 more of PM2.5 than freight trains, and 7 µg/m3 more under calm wind conditions, suggesting our study underestimates emissions and subsequent concentrations of coal train dust. Empty coal cars tended to add 2 µg/m3. Regarding peak concentrations of PM2.5, our models suggest an increase of 17.4 µg/m3 (95% CI = 6.2, 28.5; p < 0.01) from coal trains, about 3 µg/m3 more than freight trains. Given rail shipment of coal occurs globally, including in populous areas, it is likely to have adverse effects on health and environmental justice.

煤炭列车对旧金山湾区PM2.5的影响
即使在低浓度下,接触细颗粒物(PM2.5)也会对健康产生不利影响,包括死亡率。煤炭的铁路运输占美国铁路货运吨位的三分之一,是PM2.5的来源。然而,关于其对PM2.5的影响的研究有限,尤其是在城市环境中,那里的居民更容易受到空气污染。我们开发了一种新型人工智能驱动的监测系统,以量化与货运和客运列车相比,满载和空载(空载)煤炭列车的PM2.5平均和最大浓度。监视器靠近加利福尼亚州里士满的火车轨道。里士满是一个种族多样的城市,人口11.5万,哮喘和心脏病发病率很高。我们使用了多元线性回归模型来控制昼夜模式和气象。结果表明,煤炭列车平均增加8.32µg/m3(95%置信区间 = 6.37,10.28;p <; 0.01)对环境PM2.5的敏感性,而敏感性分析产生的中点范围为5至12µg/m3。燃煤列车比货运列车多贡献2至3微克/立方米的PM2.5,在无风条件下多贡献7微克/立方米,这表明我们的研究低估了燃煤列车粉尘的排放和随后的浓度。空煤车往往会增加2微克/立方米。关于PM2.5的峰值浓度,我们的模型表明PM2.5的浓度增加了17.4微克/立方米(95%置信区间 = 6.2、28.5;p <; 0.01),比货运列车多约3µg/m3。鉴于铁路运输煤炭在全球范围内发生,包括在人口稠密地区,这可能会对健康和环境正义产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health. It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes. International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements. This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信