Psychophysical Assessment of Perceptual Performance With Varying Display Frame Rates

Q Engineering
Sihem Kime;Francesco Galluppi;Xavier Lagorce;Ryad B. Benosman;Jean Lorenceau
{"title":"Psychophysical Assessment of Perceptual Performance With Varying Display Frame Rates","authors":"Sihem Kime;Francesco Galluppi;Xavier Lagorce;Ryad B. Benosman;Jean Lorenceau","doi":"10.1109/JDT.2016.2603222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study assesses the impact of display refresh rate on the perception of dynamic visual stimuli in humans. A projection platform was developed in that context, allowing control of the frame rate on a trial-by-trial basis. Using this display, we introduce a series of psychophysical experiments aimed to quantitatively assess objective perceptual performance at different frame rates. Tasks that are often implicitly performed when watching movies on a television set, or when wearing a head mounted display, were chosen: speed discrimination, spatial discrimination, and reading abilities, with stimuli undergoing horizontal motion in a wide range of speeds (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$16-38\\;\\text{deg/s}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n). The results show that whatever the stimuli or the task, performance is significantly better at high frame rate (HFR) compared to 60 Hz, providing clear-cut evidence that low refresh rates limit the ability to reliably analyze moving stimuli. These results extend those of previous psychophysical experiments performed at low refresh rates, further characterize genuine visual performance in humans and provide an objective benchmarking methodology allowing to assess visual performance with a variety of displays. Results indicate that for low resolution displays, where increasing spatial resolution is not an option, increasing frame rate could benefit motion perception. We discuss these results and their implications with regards to current and emerging categories of visual displays, such as head mounted displays.","PeriodicalId":15588,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Display Technology","volume":"12 11","pages":"1372-1382"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/JDT.2016.2603222","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Display Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7559719/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This study assesses the impact of display refresh rate on the perception of dynamic visual stimuli in humans. A projection platform was developed in that context, allowing control of the frame rate on a trial-by-trial basis. Using this display, we introduce a series of psychophysical experiments aimed to quantitatively assess objective perceptual performance at different frame rates. Tasks that are often implicitly performed when watching movies on a television set, or when wearing a head mounted display, were chosen: speed discrimination, spatial discrimination, and reading abilities, with stimuli undergoing horizontal motion in a wide range of speeds ( $16-38\;\text{deg/s}$ ). The results show that whatever the stimuli or the task, performance is significantly better at high frame rate (HFR) compared to 60 Hz, providing clear-cut evidence that low refresh rates limit the ability to reliably analyze moving stimuli. These results extend those of previous psychophysical experiments performed at low refresh rates, further characterize genuine visual performance in humans and provide an objective benchmarking methodology allowing to assess visual performance with a variety of displays. Results indicate that for low resolution displays, where increasing spatial resolution is not an option, increasing frame rate could benefit motion perception. We discuss these results and their implications with regards to current and emerging categories of visual displays, such as head mounted displays.
不同显示帧率下感知性能的心理物理评估
本研究评估了显示器刷新率对人类动态视觉刺激感知的影响。在这种情况下开发了一个投影平台,允许在逐个试验的基础上控制帧速率。利用这种显示,我们介绍了一系列心理物理学实验,旨在定量评估不同帧率下的客观感知表现。选择了在电视机上看电影或佩戴头戴式显示器时通常隐含执行的任务:速度辨别、空间辨别和阅读能力,刺激物在宽速度范围内进行水平运动($16-38\;\text{deg/s}$)。结果表明,无论是什么刺激或任务,与60Hz相比,在高帧率(HFR)下的性能都明显更好,这提供了明确的证据,表明低刷新率限制了可靠分析运动刺激的能力。这些结果扩展了以前在低刷新率下进行的心理物理实验的结果,进一步表征了人类的真实视觉表现,并提供了一种客观的基准方法,允许评估各种显示器的视觉表现。结果表明,对于不能选择提高空间分辨率的低分辨率显示器,提高帧速率有利于运动感知。我们讨论了这些结果及其对当前和新兴类别的视觉显示器(如头戴式显示器)的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Display Technology
Journal of Display Technology 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: This publication covers the theory, material, design, fabrication, manufacturing and application of information displays and aspects of display technology that emphasize the progress in device engineering, design and simulation, materials, electronics, physics, and reliability aspects of displays and the application of displays. The Journal is sponsored by EDS, seven other IEEE societies (BT, CES, CPMT, IA, IM, PHO and SSC) and the Optical Society of America (OSA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信