Costs and benefits of constructed wetlands for meeting new water quality standards from China's wastewater treatment plants

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Jialin Chen , Fei Guo , Fengchang Wu , Brett A. Bryan
{"title":"Costs and benefits of constructed wetlands for meeting new water quality standards from China's wastewater treatment plants","authors":"Jialin Chen ,&nbsp;Fei Guo ,&nbsp;Fengchang Wu ,&nbsp;Brett A. Bryan","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To preserve and restore water ecosystems, China has implemented increasingly stringent emissions standards (Weak, Moderate, and Ambitious) for wastewater treatment plants and constructed wetlands (CWs) are an effective means of improving tailwater standards. We used Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing models to quantify the economic and environmental costs and benefits of upgrading drainage standards through CW for 8054 WWTPs in China, and calculated their benefit–cost ratios (BCR). Two land-use scenarios were considered according to whether cultivated land was eligible for use by CWs. The construction phase was the greatest contributor to both environmental impact and cost. BCR were 3.53, 2.49, and 2.39 when cultivated land was ineligible for CW construction and 3.13, 2.16, and 2.20 when eligible. This provides an evidence base for decision-makers to select appropriate emission standards and whether to include cultivated land in the planning of CWs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 107248"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344923003828","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To preserve and restore water ecosystems, China has implemented increasingly stringent emissions standards (Weak, Moderate, and Ambitious) for wastewater treatment plants and constructed wetlands (CWs) are an effective means of improving tailwater standards. We used Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing models to quantify the economic and environmental costs and benefits of upgrading drainage standards through CW for 8054 WWTPs in China, and calculated their benefit–cost ratios (BCR). Two land-use scenarios were considered according to whether cultivated land was eligible for use by CWs. The construction phase was the greatest contributor to both environmental impact and cost. BCR were 3.53, 2.49, and 2.39 when cultivated land was ineligible for CW construction and 3.13, 2.16, and 2.20 when eligible. This provides an evidence base for decision-makers to select appropriate emission standards and whether to include cultivated land in the planning of CWs.

Abstract Image

人工湿地满足中国污水处理厂新水质标准的成本和效益
为了保护和恢复水生态系统,中国对污水处理厂实施了越来越严格的排放标准(弱、中等和雄心勃勃),人工湿地是提高尾水标准的有效手段。我们使用生命周期评估和生命周期成本计算模型来量化中国8054个污水处理厂通过CW升级排水标准的经济和环境成本和效益,并计算其效益成本比(BCR)。根据耕地是否符合化学武器使用条件,考虑了两种土地使用情景。施工阶段对环境影响和成本的贡献最大。当耕地不符合CW建设条件时,BCR分别为3.53、2.49和2.39,当符合条件时,分别为3.13、2.16和2.20。这为决策者选择适当的排放标准以及是否将耕地纳入化学武器的规划提供了证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信