Synergistic effects of economic benefits, resource conservation and carbon mitigation of kitchen waste recycling from the perspective of carbon neutrality

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Zhaohua Wang , Shuxuan Wang , Hao Li , Yang Lu , Bin Zhang , Hongzhi Zhang , Shuang Zhang
{"title":"Synergistic effects of economic benefits, resource conservation and carbon mitigation of kitchen waste recycling from the perspective of carbon neutrality","authors":"Zhaohua Wang ,&nbsp;Shuxuan Wang ,&nbsp;Hao Li ,&nbsp;Yang Lu ,&nbsp;Bin Zhang ,&nbsp;Hongzhi Zhang ,&nbsp;Shuang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Kitchen waste, accounts for 40 %∼60 % of China's municipal solid waste, which recycles not only avoid waste of resources, but also reduces </span>greenhouse gas emissions<span>. Based on the survey data of Beijing municipal waste treatment plant<span><span>, this study uses life cycle assessment<span><span> to evaluate three kinds of kitchen waste treatment modes: aerobic composting, </span>anaerobic digestion and anaerobic synergy. Then we analyze the </span></span>technical feasibility, economic benefits and mitigation potential of three waste treatment modes. The anaerobic synergy has the highest technical feasibility and economic benefits. The total </span></span></span>carbon emissions<span> of different modes, through quantifying its emissions of collection, transportation, disposal and leakage<span>, was aerobic composting &gt; anaerobic digestion &gt; anaerobic synergy. If all kitchen waste were treated with anaerobic synergy, cumulative carbon mitigation per person during 2025∼2060 was expected to 1019.2—1813.2 kg. Thus, recycling kitchen waste has a large mitigation potential to achieve China's carbon neutrality.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 107262"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344923003968","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kitchen waste, accounts for 40 %∼60 % of China's municipal solid waste, which recycles not only avoid waste of resources, but also reduces greenhouse gas emissions. Based on the survey data of Beijing municipal waste treatment plant, this study uses life cycle assessment to evaluate three kinds of kitchen waste treatment modes: aerobic composting, anaerobic digestion and anaerobic synergy. Then we analyze the technical feasibility, economic benefits and mitigation potential of three waste treatment modes. The anaerobic synergy has the highest technical feasibility and economic benefits. The total carbon emissions of different modes, through quantifying its emissions of collection, transportation, disposal and leakage, was aerobic composting > anaerobic digestion > anaerobic synergy. If all kitchen waste were treated with anaerobic synergy, cumulative carbon mitigation per person during 2025∼2060 was expected to 1019.2—1813.2 kg. Thus, recycling kitchen waste has a large mitigation potential to achieve China's carbon neutrality.

Abstract Image

碳中和视角下餐厨废弃物资源化利用的经济效益、资源节约和碳减排协同效应
餐厨垃圾占中国城市固体废物的40%~60%,回收利用不仅避免了资源浪费,还减少了温室气体排放。本研究以北京市城市垃圾处理厂的调查数据为基础,采用生命周期评价方法,对好氧堆肥、厌氧消化和厌氧协同三种餐厨垃圾处理模式进行了评价。然后分析了三种垃圾处理模式的技术可行性、经济效益和缓解潜力。厌氧协同具有最高的技术可行性和经济效益。不同模式的总碳排放量,通过量化其收集、运输、处置和泄漏的排放量,为好氧堆肥>;厌氧消化>;厌氧协同作用。如果对所有餐厨垃圾进行厌氧协同处理,2025年至2060年期间人均累计碳减排量预计为1019.2-1813.2 kg。因此,回收餐厨垃圾对实现中国碳中和具有巨大的减排潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信