Benchmarking outcomes for day surgery

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Leopoldo Vicente Rodriguez (Assitant Professor of Anesthesiology) , Joshua Aaron Bloomstone ((Hons) Associate Professor of Surgery)
{"title":"Benchmarking outcomes for day surgery","authors":"Leopoldo Vicente Rodriguez (Assitant Professor of Anesthesiology) ,&nbsp;Joshua Aaron Bloomstone ((Hons) Associate Professor of Surgery)","doi":"10.1016/j.bpa.2023.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In comparison to large acute care centers, Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs) provide patient-centered, fast, efficient, effective, high-value, high-quality, reliable, and safe care. For these reasons, ASCs are often preferred working venues for perioperative staff and desirable partners for surgeons, proceduralists, and anesthesiologists. Given today's many headwinds, including inflation, downward rate pressures, increasing regulation, and near constant supply chain issues, not to mention increasing patient and procedural complexity, exemplary clinical and operational management is of paramount importance and requires frequent measurement and benchmarking. Benchmarking is critical to performance assessment and is vital for assessing existing processes and new pathways and protocols, and remains the best way to identify areas for improvement. This chapter provides the reader with an overview of key ASC-related performance indicators, what they mean, and how best to measure and compare them to local, regional, and national benchmarks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48541,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research-Clinical Anaesthesiology","volume":"37 3","pages":"Pages 331-342"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research-Clinical Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521689623000137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In comparison to large acute care centers, Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs) provide patient-centered, fast, efficient, effective, high-value, high-quality, reliable, and safe care. For these reasons, ASCs are often preferred working venues for perioperative staff and desirable partners for surgeons, proceduralists, and anesthesiologists. Given today's many headwinds, including inflation, downward rate pressures, increasing regulation, and near constant supply chain issues, not to mention increasing patient and procedural complexity, exemplary clinical and operational management is of paramount importance and requires frequent measurement and benchmarking. Benchmarking is critical to performance assessment and is vital for assessing existing processes and new pathways and protocols, and remains the best way to identify areas for improvement. This chapter provides the reader with an overview of key ASC-related performance indicators, what they mean, and how best to measure and compare them to local, regional, and national benchmarks.

日间手术的基准结果
与大型急性护理中心相比,门诊手术中心(ASC)提供以患者为中心、快速、高效、有效、高价值、高质量、可靠和安全的护理。出于这些原因,ASCs通常是围手术期工作人员的首选工作场所,也是外科医生、程序学家和麻醉师的理想合作伙伴。考虑到当今的许多不利因素,包括通货膨胀、利率下降压力、监管力度加大和几乎持续的供应链问题,更不用说患者和程序的复杂性增加了,模范的临床和运营管理至关重要,需要经常进行测量和基准测试。基准对绩效评估至关重要,对评估现有流程、新途径和协议至关重要,仍然是确定改进领域的最佳方式。本章向读者概述了ASC相关的关键绩效指标,它们的含义,以及如何最好地衡量和比较它们与地方、地区和国家基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
36 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信