{"title":"Factors affecting the use of magnetic resonance imaging in a Southern European region: a qualitative study","authors":"Yolanda González-Rábago , Erika Valero , Paola Bully , Pedro Latorre , Begoña Fernandez-Ruanova","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has increased significantly in recent years. Superior diagnostic capability and extension of criteria for the performance of MRI may explain this increase, but there are also non-clinical factors that influence doctors’ decisions. We aim to describe the views of doctors in the Basque Country (Spain) regarding factors affecting MRI orders.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with doctors based on intentional sampling to cover a diverse range of interviewees according to personal and professional characteristics (sex, workplace, post of responsibility). We analyzed transcript content using an inductive approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Factors identified by doctors were classified into three themes: 1) superior diagnostic capability of the MRI compared to other imaging modalities has favoured MRI use and inclusion in Clinical Practice Guidelines; 2) patient demands, owing to lower trust and acceptance of doctors’ judgment than to technology-based medicine, leads to patient-doctor relationships that result unnecessary MRI test; 3) structural or contextual aspects of the health system, such as excessive rotation of doctors or a lack of time to carry out a thorough patient examination, which disempower doctors and favour overuse.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Doctors identified non-clinical factors that affect MRI use and that lead to unintended consequences both for the healthcare system and for patients. We recommend an organizational approach to give doctors enough resources to overcome non-clinical factors that lead to excessive MRI orders in order to optimize its use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883723000928","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
The use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has increased significantly in recent years. Superior diagnostic capability and extension of criteria for the performance of MRI may explain this increase, but there are also non-clinical factors that influence doctors’ decisions. We aim to describe the views of doctors in the Basque Country (Spain) regarding factors affecting MRI orders.
Methods
We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with doctors based on intentional sampling to cover a diverse range of interviewees according to personal and professional characteristics (sex, workplace, post of responsibility). We analyzed transcript content using an inductive approach.
Results
Factors identified by doctors were classified into three themes: 1) superior diagnostic capability of the MRI compared to other imaging modalities has favoured MRI use and inclusion in Clinical Practice Guidelines; 2) patient demands, owing to lower trust and acceptance of doctors’ judgment than to technology-based medicine, leads to patient-doctor relationships that result unnecessary MRI test; 3) structural or contextual aspects of the health system, such as excessive rotation of doctors or a lack of time to carry out a thorough patient examination, which disempower doctors and favour overuse.
Conclusions
Doctors identified non-clinical factors that affect MRI use and that lead to unintended consequences both for the healthcare system and for patients. We recommend an organizational approach to give doctors enough resources to overcome non-clinical factors that lead to excessive MRI orders in order to optimize its use.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments.
HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology.
Topics covered by HPT will include:
- Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems
- Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches
- National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives
- Cross-border eHealth including health tourism
- The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare
- Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies
- Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies
- Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making
- Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in)
- Regulation and health economics