Barriers and strategies to improve digital mental health intervention uptake among college students of color: A modified Delphi study

IF 1.7 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Tamar Kodish , Stephen M. Schueller , Anna S. Lau
{"title":"Barriers and strategies to improve digital mental health intervention uptake among college students of color: A modified Delphi study","authors":"Tamar Kodish ,&nbsp;Stephen M. Schueller ,&nbsp;Anna S. Lau","doi":"10.1016/j.jbct.2022.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Digital mental health interventions (DMHI) may enhance equity in college student mental health, but engagement with them is poor. Little is known about barriers and strategies to enhance DMHI uptake among college students of color. The goal of this study was to attain expert consensus on important barriers to DMHI uptake and important and feasible engagement strategies to enhance DMHI uptake among college students of color.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study utilized a modified, three-round Delphi survey. Researcher and industry stakeholders with relevant expertise participated (<em>n</em> = 35). Across rounds, experts generated and rated the importance and feasibility of barriers and strategies to promote DMHI uptake for students of color. Experts viewed group consensus and importance ratings between rounds and were provided the opportunity to re-rate items. Barriers and strategies were coded into frameworks using rapid qualitative analysis and grounded theory techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of <em>n</em> = 63 barriers and <em>n</em> = 64 strategies were derived, and consensus on level of importance was met for 98% of barriers and strategies. Key barriers included mistrust of mental health services and lack of culturally responsive care. Strategies spanned levels of implementation and emphasized codesign, diverse representation, reducing user burden, addressing privacy issues, and embedding DMHI within existing infrastructure.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study identified barriers and strategies for improving DMHI uptake for college students of color. The subset of highly feasible and important engagement strategies derived in this study provides direction for the design of scalable engagement interventions with the potential to improve DMHI implementation and reduce disparities in care receipt.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 10-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979122000543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose

Digital mental health interventions (DMHI) may enhance equity in college student mental health, but engagement with them is poor. Little is known about barriers and strategies to enhance DMHI uptake among college students of color. The goal of this study was to attain expert consensus on important barriers to DMHI uptake and important and feasible engagement strategies to enhance DMHI uptake among college students of color.

Methods

The study utilized a modified, three-round Delphi survey. Researcher and industry stakeholders with relevant expertise participated (n = 35). Across rounds, experts generated and rated the importance and feasibility of barriers and strategies to promote DMHI uptake for students of color. Experts viewed group consensus and importance ratings between rounds and were provided the opportunity to re-rate items. Barriers and strategies were coded into frameworks using rapid qualitative analysis and grounded theory techniques.

Results

A total of n = 63 barriers and n = 64 strategies were derived, and consensus on level of importance was met for 98% of barriers and strategies. Key barriers included mistrust of mental health services and lack of culturally responsive care. Strategies spanned levels of implementation and emphasized codesign, diverse representation, reducing user burden, addressing privacy issues, and embedding DMHI within existing infrastructure.

Conclusions

This study identified barriers and strategies for improving DMHI uptake for college students of color. The subset of highly feasible and important engagement strategies derived in this study provides direction for the design of scalable engagement interventions with the potential to improve DMHI implementation and reduce disparities in care receipt.

提高有色人种大学生数字心理健康干预接受率的障碍和策略:一项改进的德尔菲研究
目的数字心理健康干预(DMHI)可以提高大学生心理健康的公平性,但参与度很低。人们对提高有色人种大学生DMHI吸收率的障碍和策略知之甚少。本研究的目的是就DMHI吸收的重要障碍以及提高有色人种大学生DMHI吸收率的重要可行的参与策略达成专家共识。方法采用改良的三轮德尔菲调查。具有相关专业知识的研究人员和行业利益相关者参加了会议(n=35)。在多轮调查中,专家们提出并评估了促进有色人种学生接受DMHI的障碍和策略的重要性和可行性。专家们查看了小组共识和各轮之间的重要性评级,并有机会对项目进行重新评级。使用快速定性分析和基础理论技术将障碍和战略编码为框架。结果共推导出n=63个障碍和n=64个策略,98%的障碍和策略在重要性水平上达成共识。主要障碍包括对心理健康服务的不信任以及缺乏文化上有响应能力的护理。战略跨越了实施层面,强调代码设计、多样性表示、减少用户负担、解决隐私问题以及在现有基础设施中嵌入DMHI。结论本研究确定了提高有色人种大学生DMHI吸收的障碍和策略。本研究中得出的高度可行和重要的参与策略子集为设计可扩展的参与干预措施提供了方向,有可能改善DMHI的实施并减少护理接收的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信