A comparison between two specialized dairy cattle farms in the upper Po Valley. Precision agriculture as a strategy to improve sustainability

IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
A. Bragaglio, E. Romano, M. Brambilla, C. Bisaglia, A. Lazzari, S. Giovinazzo, M. Cutini
{"title":"A comparison between two specialized dairy cattle farms in the upper Po Valley. Precision agriculture as a strategy to improve sustainability","authors":"A. Bragaglio,&nbsp;E. Romano,&nbsp;M. Brambilla,&nbsp;C. Bisaglia,&nbsp;A. Lazzari,&nbsp;S. Giovinazzo,&nbsp;M. Cutini","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2023.100146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The current tools that allow the application of precision agriculture in livestock systems are undergoing growing diffusion. Given the significant share of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions attributable to the livestock sector, this study investigates the potential contribution of precision agriculture technologies to animal farming sustainability, particularly when considering alternative energy sources.</p><p>The research compared two intensive dairy farms in the upper Po Valley (conventional farm - CF - and precision agriculture farm - PAF) using the life cycle assessment approach, considering as declared unit 1 kg of fat protein corrected milk, and aiming to (i) assess the main environmental impact categories for precision and conventional farming; (ii) compare different allocation modes (reference, mass, economic). In the reference mode all the burdens and all the environmental impacts of the farming system are allocated to the main product, which is the milk. The chosen impact categories were: global warming potential, acidification and eutrophication potentials, non-renewable energy, agricultural land occupation and fossil depletion.</p><p>Based on the results, in the case of reference allocation, PAF impacts are lower than those from CF for all the impact categories except for global warming potential. When considering mass and economic allocations, the impacts of PAF and CF show the same behaviour for the various impact categories; however, the calculated equivalents place PAF at an increased sustainability level than CF.</p><p>Therefore, precision agriculture technologies in animal farming are viable cues for the sustainability of the zootechnical sector and are worth being deepened in future studies focusing on the outcomes of zootechnical automation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100146"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789423000405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The current tools that allow the application of precision agriculture in livestock systems are undergoing growing diffusion. Given the significant share of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions attributable to the livestock sector, this study investigates the potential contribution of precision agriculture technologies to animal farming sustainability, particularly when considering alternative energy sources.

The research compared two intensive dairy farms in the upper Po Valley (conventional farm - CF - and precision agriculture farm - PAF) using the life cycle assessment approach, considering as declared unit 1 kg of fat protein corrected milk, and aiming to (i) assess the main environmental impact categories for precision and conventional farming; (ii) compare different allocation modes (reference, mass, economic). In the reference mode all the burdens and all the environmental impacts of the farming system are allocated to the main product, which is the milk. The chosen impact categories were: global warming potential, acidification and eutrophication potentials, non-renewable energy, agricultural land occupation and fossil depletion.

Based on the results, in the case of reference allocation, PAF impacts are lower than those from CF for all the impact categories except for global warming potential. When considering mass and economic allocations, the impacts of PAF and CF show the same behaviour for the various impact categories; however, the calculated equivalents place PAF at an increased sustainability level than CF.

Therefore, precision agriculture technologies in animal farming are viable cues for the sustainability of the zootechnical sector and are worth being deepened in future studies focusing on the outcomes of zootechnical automation.

上蒲谷两个专业奶牛场的比较。精准农业作为提高可持续性的战略
目前允许在畜牧系统中应用精准农业的工具正在不断推广。鉴于畜牧业在人为温室气体排放中所占的比例很大,本研究调查了精准农业技术对畜牧业可持续性的潜在贡献,特别是在考虑替代能源时。该研究采用生命周期评估方法,对波谷上游的两个集约型奶牛场(传统农场-CF和精准农业农场-PAF)进行了比较,考虑了申报的第一单元脂肪蛋白校正牛奶,旨在(i)评估精准农业和传统农业的主要环境影响类别;(ii)比较不同的分配模式(参考、质量、经济)。在参考模式中,农业系统的所有负担和所有环境影响都分配给了主要产品,即牛奶。选定的影响类别为:全球变暖潜力、酸化和富营养化潜力、不可再生能源、农业土地占用和化石枯竭。根据结果,在参考分配的情况下,除全球变暖潜力外,所有影响类别的PAF影响都低于CF。在考虑质量和经济分配时,PAF和CF的影响在各种影响类别中表现出相同的行为;然而,计算出的当量使PAF比CF具有更高的可持续性水平。因此,畜牧业中的精准农业技术是动物技术部门可持续性的可行线索,值得在未来专注于动物技术自动化结果的研究中深化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信