The public's perception of an earthquake early warning system: A study on factors influencing continuance intention

IF 4.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Marion Lara Tan , Lauren J. Vinnell , Alvin Patrick M. Valentin , Raj Prasanna , Julia S. Becker
{"title":"The public's perception of an earthquake early warning system: A study on factors influencing continuance intention","authors":"Marion Lara Tan ,&nbsp;Lauren J. Vinnell ,&nbsp;Alvin Patrick M. Valentin ,&nbsp;Raj Prasanna ,&nbsp;Julia S. Becker","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates the perceptions of the New Zealand public towards the Android Earthquake Alert (AEA) system, a public-facing earthquake early warning system. Specifically, it examines the public's continuance intention towards the AEA system and the influencing factors of satisfaction, confirmation, perceived usefulness, and perceived trust. To gather insights into the public's perceptions regarding the AEA system, this study distributed online surveys following two separate earthquake alert events on 12 October and 22 October 2021. A total of 524 and 671 participants responded to the two events' surveys, providing valuable data for analysis and exploration. Structural Equation Modelling of the two datasets revealed that the continuance model fit the data to some extent, especially on the significance of perceived usefulness and perceived trust to continuance intention. However, the results also showed varying results for satisfaction's relationship with perceived trust and continuance intention. These findings underscore the need for further investigation into the role of satisfaction and perceived trust, considering the evolving nature of EEW technologies and users' familiarity over time. The descriptive and inferential analysis results raised concerns about potential confusion around the alerts' source and highlighted the question of responsibility and liability for EEW. Overall, this study contributes to understanding continuance intention in the EEW context and provides insights into the public's perception of the AEA system in New Zealand. The findings have implications more broadly for EEW systems’ design, implementation, and communication strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 104032"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420923005125","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the perceptions of the New Zealand public towards the Android Earthquake Alert (AEA) system, a public-facing earthquake early warning system. Specifically, it examines the public's continuance intention towards the AEA system and the influencing factors of satisfaction, confirmation, perceived usefulness, and perceived trust. To gather insights into the public's perceptions regarding the AEA system, this study distributed online surveys following two separate earthquake alert events on 12 October and 22 October 2021. A total of 524 and 671 participants responded to the two events' surveys, providing valuable data for analysis and exploration. Structural Equation Modelling of the two datasets revealed that the continuance model fit the data to some extent, especially on the significance of perceived usefulness and perceived trust to continuance intention. However, the results also showed varying results for satisfaction's relationship with perceived trust and continuance intention. These findings underscore the need for further investigation into the role of satisfaction and perceived trust, considering the evolving nature of EEW technologies and users' familiarity over time. The descriptive and inferential analysis results raised concerns about potential confusion around the alerts' source and highlighted the question of responsibility and liability for EEW. Overall, this study contributes to understanding continuance intention in the EEW context and provides insights into the public's perception of the AEA system in New Zealand. The findings have implications more broadly for EEW systems’ design, implementation, and communication strategies.

公众对地震预警系统的认知:影响持续意向因素的研究
本文调查了新西兰公众对安卓地震警报(AEA)系统的看法,该系统是一个面向公众的地震预警系统。具体而言,它考察了公众对AEA系统的持续意图,以及满意度、确认度、感知有用性和感知信任的影响因素。为了深入了解公众对AEA系统的看法,本研究在2021年10月12日和10月22日两次独立的地震警报事件后进行了在线调查。共有524名和671名参与者对这两项活动的调查做出了回应,为分析和探索提供了宝贵的数据。对两个数据集的结构方程建模表明,持续模型在一定程度上符合数据,特别是在感知有用性和感知信任对持续意图的重要性方面。然而,研究结果也显示,满意度与感知信任和持续意向的关系存在不同的结果。这些发现强调了对满意度和感知信任的作用进行进一步调查的必要性,考虑到EEW技术的演变性质和用户随着时间的推移的熟悉程度。描述性和推断性分析结果引起了人们对警报来源潜在混乱的担忧,并强调了EEW的责任和责任问题。总的来说,这项研究有助于理解EEW背景下的持续意图,并深入了解公众对新西兰AEA系统的看法。研究结果对EEW系统的设计、实施和沟通策略具有更广泛的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信