Trends and policy in bioeconomy literature: A bibliometric review

Hannah Gould, Luke Kelleher, Eoin O'Neill
{"title":"Trends and policy in bioeconomy literature: A bibliometric review","authors":"Hannah Gould,&nbsp;Luke Kelleher,&nbsp;Eoin O'Neill","doi":"10.1016/j.bioeco.2023.100047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The concept of a sustainable bioeconomy is gaining traction on the international political agenda with governments around the world adopting bioeconomy strategies. Considering the growing need for bioeconomy policymaking expertise and knowledge, this paper provides a high-level quantitative overview of bioeconomy literature which relates to policy. Based on a bibliometric analysis, the findings suggest that the bioeconomy as a policy and research concept is relatively new but growing, with European countries (specifically in North and North-West Europe) taking charge. Topics of bioenergy and forestry are most prevalent, reflecting policy areas that can be said to pre-exist bioeconomy strategies. As a supplement to the high-level quantitative analysis, a content review of the most cited-papers found critical engagement and scepticism of some of the sustainability claims found in promissory bioeconomy policy discourse. This paper provides an overview of trends that will be useful for stakeholders building their knowledge on the topic of bioeconomy, policy and society. The framing and goals of the bioeconomy have been constantly evolving in EU policy discourse. This review establishes a baseline for future research to map chronological trends in bioeconomy literature which relates to policy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100394,"journal":{"name":"EFB Bioeconomy Journal","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100047"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFB Bioeconomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667041023000022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The concept of a sustainable bioeconomy is gaining traction on the international political agenda with governments around the world adopting bioeconomy strategies. Considering the growing need for bioeconomy policymaking expertise and knowledge, this paper provides a high-level quantitative overview of bioeconomy literature which relates to policy. Based on a bibliometric analysis, the findings suggest that the bioeconomy as a policy and research concept is relatively new but growing, with European countries (specifically in North and North-West Europe) taking charge. Topics of bioenergy and forestry are most prevalent, reflecting policy areas that can be said to pre-exist bioeconomy strategies. As a supplement to the high-level quantitative analysis, a content review of the most cited-papers found critical engagement and scepticism of some of the sustainability claims found in promissory bioeconomy policy discourse. This paper provides an overview of trends that will be useful for stakeholders building their knowledge on the topic of bioeconomy, policy and society. The framing and goals of the bioeconomy have been constantly evolving in EU policy discourse. This review establishes a baseline for future research to map chronological trends in bioeconomy literature which relates to policy.

生物经济文献的趋势与政策:文献计量学综述
随着世界各国政府采取生物经济战略,可持续生物经济的概念在国际政治议程上越来越受到重视。考虑到对生物经济决策专业知识和知识的需求日益增长,本文对与政策相关的生物经济文献进行了高水平的定量概述。基于文献计量分析,研究结果表明,生物经济作为一种政策和研究概念相对较新,但正在发展,由欧洲国家(特别是北欧和西北欧)负责。生物能源和林业的主题最为普遍,反映了可以说是预先存在的生物经济战略的政策领域。作为高级定量分析的补充,对引用最多的论文进行了内容审查,发现对前景生物经济政策话语中的一些可持续性主张存在批评和怀疑。本文概述了趋势,这将有助于利益相关者建立他们对生物经济、政策和社会主题的知识。生物经济的框架和目标在欧盟政策讨论中不断演变。这篇综述为未来的研究建立了一个基线,以绘制与政策相关的生物经济文献的时间趋势图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信