Comparison of organic eggplant yields under open-field and high tunnel production systems in Texas

Azeezahmed Shaik , Sukhbir Singh , Thayne Montague , Matthew G. Siebecker , Glen Ritchie , Russell W. Wallace , Richard Stevens
{"title":"Comparison of organic eggplant yields under open-field and high tunnel production systems in Texas","authors":"Azeezahmed Shaik ,&nbsp;Sukhbir Singh ,&nbsp;Thayne Montague ,&nbsp;Matthew G. Siebecker ,&nbsp;Glen Ritchie ,&nbsp;Russell W. Wallace ,&nbsp;Richard Stevens","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>High tunnel (HT) vegetable cultivation stands out as a superior choice when compared to open field (OF) production due to its numerous production benefits. However, intensive cultivation practices involving excessive use of inorganic fertilizer (IF) in HT production systems may lead to degradation of soil health, and ultimately poor crop yields. Therefore, this study investigated the effect of liquid organic fertilizer (LOF) and IF on growth and yield of eggplant (<em>Solanum melongena</em> L.) cultivars in HT and OF production systems. Two experiments were conducted in a split-split plot design with production systems (HT and OF) as main plot, fertilizers (LOF and IF) as sub-plot, and cultivars (‘Angela’ and ‘Jaylo’) as sub-sub plot factors. Throughout the growing season, daily average temperature and relative humidity were greater by 2 to 4 ​°C and 2 to 4%, respectively, under HT compared to OF conditions. In contrast, average daily light integral of HT decreased 18 to 24% compared to OF. Results from pooled growth and yield data of both experiments indicate HT produced 61% taller plants with 62% thicker stem diameter compared to OF. However, eggplant height and stem diameter did not differ significantly between fertilizer treatments or between cultivars. Due to a greater fruit count for each plant (63%) and average fruit weight (9%), total yield was 84% greater in HT compared to OF. Eggplant cultivar ‘Jaylo’ yielded 33% greater fruit count for each plant and 38% greater fruit yield compared to ‘Angela’ cultivar. However, no differences in fruit count, fruit weight, and the total yield were observed between LOF and IF. Results indicate that HT production offered a favorable microclimate which encouraged plant growth and greater fruit yield of eggplant compared to OF conditions. LOF and ‘Jaylo’ could be successfully used in organic eggplant production in HT and OF systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"1 3","pages":"Article 100049"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farming System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911923000515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High tunnel (HT) vegetable cultivation stands out as a superior choice when compared to open field (OF) production due to its numerous production benefits. However, intensive cultivation practices involving excessive use of inorganic fertilizer (IF) in HT production systems may lead to degradation of soil health, and ultimately poor crop yields. Therefore, this study investigated the effect of liquid organic fertilizer (LOF) and IF on growth and yield of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) cultivars in HT and OF production systems. Two experiments were conducted in a split-split plot design with production systems (HT and OF) as main plot, fertilizers (LOF and IF) as sub-plot, and cultivars (‘Angela’ and ‘Jaylo’) as sub-sub plot factors. Throughout the growing season, daily average temperature and relative humidity were greater by 2 to 4 ​°C and 2 to 4%, respectively, under HT compared to OF conditions. In contrast, average daily light integral of HT decreased 18 to 24% compared to OF. Results from pooled growth and yield data of both experiments indicate HT produced 61% taller plants with 62% thicker stem diameter compared to OF. However, eggplant height and stem diameter did not differ significantly between fertilizer treatments or between cultivars. Due to a greater fruit count for each plant (63%) and average fruit weight (9%), total yield was 84% greater in HT compared to OF. Eggplant cultivar ‘Jaylo’ yielded 33% greater fruit count for each plant and 38% greater fruit yield compared to ‘Angela’ cultivar. However, no differences in fruit count, fruit weight, and the total yield were observed between LOF and IF. Results indicate that HT production offered a favorable microclimate which encouraged plant growth and greater fruit yield of eggplant compared to OF conditions. LOF and ‘Jaylo’ could be successfully used in organic eggplant production in HT and OF systems.

德克萨斯州露天和高隧道生产系统下有机茄子产量的比较
与露地(OF)生产相比,高隧道(HT)蔬菜种植因其众多的生产效益而成为一种优越的选择。然而,在耐高温生产系统中过度使用无机肥料的集约化种植做法可能会导致土壤健康退化,最终导致作物产量下降。因此,本研究探讨了液态有机肥(LOF)和IF在HT和of生产系统中对茄子(Solanum melongena L.)品种生长和产量的影响。以生产系统(HT和OF)为主区,肥料(LOF和IF)为辅区,品种(“Angela”和“Jaylo”)为辅区因子,在分块设计中进行了两个实验。在整个生长季节,日平均温度和相对湿度增加了2-4​与OF条件相比,HT条件下分别为°C和2%至4%。相反,HT的平均日光积分与of相比下降了18-24%。两个实验的生长和产量数据汇总结果表明,与of相比,HT产生的植株高61%,茎粗62%。然而,不同肥料处理或不同品种之间,茄子的高度和茎径没有显著差异。由于每株植物的果实数量更大(63%),平均果实重量(9%),与OF相比,HT的总产量高84%。与“Angela”品种相比,茄子品种“Jaylo”每株的果实数增加了33%,果实产量增加了38%。然而,LOF和IF在果实数量、果实重量和总产量方面没有观察到差异。结果表明,与of条件相比,HT生产提供了有利的小气候,促进了茄子的生长和更高的果实产量。LOF和“Jaylo”可以成功地用于HT和OF系统中的有机茄子生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信